Judging Controversy - Part 1 of 3
Derek Koopowitz
derekkoopowitz at earthlink.net
Sat Sep 11 08:44:52 AKDT 2004
The facts were WAY off... Not off slightly.
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of Del Rykert
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 3:22 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Judging Controversy - Part 1 of 3
The facts were off slightly but Ron could have set the record straight if he
chose to. He has chosen not to clarify his transgression.
del
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derek Koopowitz" <derekkoopowitz at earthlink.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 1:35 AM
Subject: RE: Judging Controversy - Part 1 of 3
> Joe,
>
> What I don't see from you or Eric Henderson is an apology to Ron Van Putte
> for the blatant lies that were written in this forum about Ron's apparent
> removal from the WC's judging pool during the WC. That, to me, is an
> egregious error made on your part for posting a total erroneous message
from
> Eric and then for not stepping up to the plate and apologizing for it.
>
> Now... That is too bad for this hobby of ours.
>
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
>
>
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list