European Champs, Alcochete, Portugal 2004 ** Klipped **

[BUDDYonRC at aol.com]

I to usually don't respond to items such as this but I feel  that I need to 
put my two cents worth in now. Not that it makes any difference  to me who will 
be the judge for the 2005 WC but it seems that if AMA was  aware of an 
agreement that they have with NSRCA They would have notified  NSRCA of their 
decision to not abide with that agreement, especially if their  decision was made as 
far back as the 2003 WC selection contest. Was this some  sort of secret that 
they didn't want to be made public and why? What are their  motives? Items 
such as this only seem to undermine the working relationship  that we supposedly 
have between AMA and NSRCA. Maybe that is their motive? I  surely hope not. If 
it is, from my view point It's time to rally around  the cause and try 
something and or someone new who understands exactly  the definition of the word 
agreement and also by eliminating the word  Dictator from their vocabulary.
I might have a different opinion had this item had any  significant impact on 
the AMA by affecting any other SIG, individual or the  overall AMA membership 
but I cant see how it does. 
Thanks to all who still believe that open discussion within  the group will 
foster a better and stronger democratic organization your cause  will always 
win out over other self centered politically motivated people  and groups who 
think the silent majority will not step forward and put an  end to their attempt 
to blatantly disregard the decisions of the majority.  If these comments are 
out of line or are any way inaccurate please set me  straight I will 
appreciate it and retract them at that time.
Buddy Brammer 50 year + member of  AMA  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040907/52f74992/attachment.html