No advancement??

[John Ferrell]

Thanks for catching my error. I was relying on the summary as posted on the RadioSouth site.
Here is the actual text from the AMA site:
RCA-05-8: Replace the first sentence in paragraph 8.2.3 to read: "The accumulated points for required class advancement will be based on a sliding scale of 4 years time. Advancement points acquired before the forth (4) year will not count towards advancement".

Replace the second sentence in paragraph 8.2.3 to read: "In other words, a contestant's point accumulation is based on the total accumulation for his/her previous four (4) years of competition".

I will forward this to the list as well.  I fear I have simply clouded the question.

John Ferrell    
http://DixieNC.US

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: ronlock 
  To: johnferrell at earthlink.net 
  Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 6:40 PM
  Subject: Re: No advancement??


  Hi John,
  Sorry I'm a day late comming to this party, just got back from business travel.   This is not going to the list, just to you.

  But, might I ask you to re-check that the Advancement proposal?

  The way I read it, RCA 05-8 is strangely worded.  The Brief Summary of the change says "Eliminate the forced advancement of those who cannot attain the expertise because of age and /or skill level limitations."

  However, the Exact wording proposed says  "The accumulated points for required class advancement witll be based on a sliding scale of 4 years time.   ....."    That is what will show up in the book.

  What cha think??

  Later, Ron
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: John Ferrell 
    To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:06 AM
    Subject: Re: What class should I fly in?


    The new rule RCA-05 says advancement is no longer mandatory in 2005.

    John Ferrell    
    http://DixieNC.US

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040904/76236493/attachment.html