Judge evaluation
John Ferrell
johnferrell at earthlink.net
Fri Oct 29 15:04:37 AKDT 2004
You sent me to the dictionary on that one, my ignorence is showing!
>From http://www.m-w.com/
Main Entry: pro·lix
Pronunciation: prO-'liks, 'prO-(")
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French & Latin; Middle French
prolixe, from Latin prolixus extended, from pro- forward + liquEre to be
fluid -- more at LIQUID
1 : unduly prolonged or drawn out : too long
2 : marked by or using an excess of words
synonym see WORDY
- pro·lix·i·ty /prO-'lik-s&-tE/ noun
- pro·lix·ly adverb
Seriously, I doubt you can find a popular definition of what is a
"good judge". As a CD, I am happy to have judges that are available and
percieved satisfactory by those they are judging. It is a definate plus if
they have been certified via the NSRCA program.
That is normally the best I can hope for.
I think the first goal is to jiudging consistant and the second goal
is accuracy.
John Ferrell
My Competition is not my enemy!
http://DixieNC.US
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff H. Snider" <jeff at snider.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: Judge evaluation
> Several kinds of judging problems have been raised here in the past
> day. I have too many thoughts on the various subjects to usefully
> put in one message, and I've been unduly prolix this week, so I'll
> limit myself as much as possible.
>
> In my opinion, we have (or really ought) to have some method of
> ranking judges. Two solutions present themselves to my overactive
> mind, one computational and one personal.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 109 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041029/7a73641c/attachment.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 43 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041029/7a73641c/attachment-0001.gif
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list