Suggestions for Sport Pattern 40 - 60 size plane
Tom Simes
nsrca at shinymetalass.com
Mon Oct 18 06:48:07 AKDT 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Paul Horan
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 8:43 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Suggestions for Sport Pattern 40 - 60 size plane
>
> I am contemplating getting a knock around plane that I can use for
> sport but still practice Intermediate.
> Any ideas.
> Thanks,
> Paul
> =====================================
I put together Venus earlier this year with an OS .46 AX and I
cannot recommend that combination. The ARF came out @ 5.2 lbs. (within
GP's weight specs), but the Venus is really too large for a .45 class
motor. It has a lot of frontal area and is fine for a sport flyer with
that engine but it just doesn't have enough power to perform even
sportsman maneuvers with authority. I chose a Venus after reading some
of the reviews over on RCU, but ended up being quite disappointed with
the performance. I also ended up having to add 1.25 oz of lead to the
right wing to make the aircraft balance laterally so I suspect there
were some QC problems with the Venus I got. It might be a different
aircraft with a Saito .72 or.82, but with a .46 mine is a dog.
Have you considered a Hanger 9 Aresti 40? I've seen one of those
fly with an OS .46 FX on it with a Macs muffler and it flew quite well.
I was also impressed with the construction of the Aresti.
--
Tom
_____________________________________________________________________
|| | , |
_ ____-||-____ _ ---------(@)---------
/ ) | ___ ___ | ( \ --|--
_( (_ || _ | | _ || _) ) '
(((\ \>| / )| |( \||</ /)))
(\\\\ \_/ /- -\ \_/ ////) "That's not flying, that's just
\ /________\ / falling with style!" Woody, Toy Story
\ _/ \_ /
/ /|____________|\ \ Tom Simes - AMA 230068
/ / \ \ nsrca at shinymetalass.com
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list