Engines - long

[Jason]

Nothing that I'm aware of yet.

-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Richard Strickland
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 1:51 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Engines - long


Hey Jason,

Anything new on the OS front we should know about?

Richard S.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason" <jasonshulman at cox.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 3:45 PM
Subject: RE: Engines - long


> Actually Dave, I am not a YS sponsored pilot. I am a OS/Hacker sponsored
> pilot though <G>.
>
> Jason
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of David Lockhart
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:33 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Engines - long
>
> And while not positive, I believe every pilot in the 2004 NATs F3A finals
> was sponsored by YS - and YS by far sponsors the most pilots.  I'd be
> willing to bet that if OS, Webra, or Hacker provided an equal level of
> sponsorship the number of sponsored YS pilots would diminish
substantially.
> In view of the engine problems I had at the 2004 NATs, I was asked by 2 of
> the finalists why I was running the 2C and not a 4C.  I replied less
weight,
> less vibration, more power, more reliability - and while neither
disagreed,
> both felt having a YS sponsorship made the difference (as they both
believed
> I would be able to obtain YS sponsorship).
>
>
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.


=====================================
# To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.