wing tip shape - del Klipped 4 reposting..
Del Rykert
drykert at localnet.com
Thu Nov 25 02:16:09 AKST 2004
Hi John.
We seal the gap primarily to obtain consistent and equal response to the
deflection of the flight surface. Granted in a not well supported hinged
surface it may also encourage flutter and ailerons extended into wingtip are
very susceptible to flutter. With surfaces sealed I see no advantaged of
rounding the leading edge or not.
Happy Turkey Day to all.
del
NSRCA - 473
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Pavlick" <jpavlick at idseng.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:38 PM
Subject: RE: wing tip shape
> Hey, That's how they are on my Super Kaos Jr. Not exactly 45 degrees, but
> the outboard 3" is tapers toward the tip. If you do this by sanding the
> bottom edge of the aileron at the tip, you also add a little washout to
> help
> prevent tip stalls. Not sure if it's enough to make a difference but I can
> land this plane nose high without any surprises. Someone mentioned
> rounding
> the leading edge of control surfaces rather than beveling them - I've
> always
> done this unless the surface is really thick (like a barn-door aileron).
> In
> the 1st U.S. R/C Flight School training manual (the red one) the idea of
> control surfaces with round leading edges that are slightly thicker than
> the
> fixed surface is discussed. They claim it reduces flutter (without sealing
> the gaps) and makes the control response less speed sensitive. Has anyone
> tried this? It would be interesting to hear if it works on pattern planes.
>
> John Pavlick
> http://www.idseng.com
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list