[SPAM] RE: Unusal Props

[DaveL322 at comcast.net]

I believe the CAD/CAM, software, algorithms, etc used to develop the technology/process for the APC prop line came from "quiet" propellers on submarines.

Regards,

Dave Lockhart
DaveL322 at comcast.net

-------------- Original message -------------- 

Dave Von Linsowe was experimenting with semi-scimitar shaped props at that time, I wonder if APC was influenced by his efforts.



Rich


-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 1:32 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Unusal Props


Yes we do. The semi-scimitar design was a huge departure from the "Normal". I heard from many "...what an ugly prop.....never will use.... blah, blah, blah...." among other things. But performance has silenced everyone.

Matt


In a message dated 11/17/2004 1:24:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, rcaerobob at cox.net writes:
Mostly the Rev Ups were used because they made our motors SING!!!  I mean FAST...LOUD...but never went anywhere.
    We didn't know better.

Then came MK and Asano....
Then this maverick APC thing....Boys, we remember when THOSE first hit the pits, don't we??????????

Bob Pastorello
NSRCA 199  AMA 46373
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Eddie Batchelor 
To: discussion at nsrca.org 
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:18 PM
Subject: RE: Unusal Props


True  It might be that.
I don't think I've ever seen a prop labeled as to how many blades.
Interesting thought
I like you're "tlarld"

the prop markings are like this
          2
      12  O  5
        REV-UP

with the "O" being the hole in the middle.

It's times like this I wish the "list" could handle pictures. <G>

Eddie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041117/24c727c0/attachment.html