Another Temple Plane

Gene Maurice gene.maurice at comcast.net
Fri May 28 17:02:24 AKDT 2004


Tony,

 

Not to take away anything from your design, it really looks good and flies
great, but I thinks Todd could probably score 10's flying a brick with
sufficient horsepower in the nose. :-)

 

Gene Maurice

gene.maurice at comcast.net

Plano, TX

NSRCA 877

AMA 3408

 

  _____  

From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of tony at radiosouthrc.com
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 12:27 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Another Temple Plane

 

Bob:

Thanks for the post about my design.  You think some of the great flying
quality MIGHT have something to do with the pilot??   <VBG>

 

 

Tony Stillman
Radio South
3702 N. Pace Blvd.
Pensacola, FL 32505
1-800-962-7802
www.radiosouthrc.com

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Bob Pastorello <mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net>  

To: NSRCA <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>  

Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 11:52 AM

Subject: Another Temple Plane

 

I had an opportunity to observe (and judge) Todd Blose's PAC "Panacea",
designed by Tony Stillman.

 

Even with so few flights on it, he looked very solid, and the plane
presented very well. I was amazed at it's ability to stay put, and still
have good penetration.  Looked great!

 

It handled the P-05 Snaps, and all those Reversing Rolls with ease.  First
one of these I've seen, and sure looks like it could be a real winner.

 

BTW - the front end is so big, that if a person ran the OS 1.60 with
wrap-around header, there would STILL not be any cutting required.  The fuse
opening is large enough to put most other airplanes' canopies inside!!

    It was a surprise to see something this large and easy to see...yet fly
so well in those conditions!


Bob Pastorello
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040528/d430e0c3/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list