rules proposals final result
Bill Glaze
billglaze at triad.rr.com
Sun May 9 11:18:31 AKDT 2004
Bob:
Further considering that, while many of the members of the CB are "us",
as far as I'm concerned some of them have shown little but contempt for
those whose interests they are supposed to be "safeguarding."
Therefore, countering their recent slap in the face of our requests,
makes sense to me. IMO only.
Bill Glaze
Bob Pastorello wrote:
>Considering that many of the contest board members are "us", what would it
>accomplish by negating their efforts, however we may feel about it?
>Would not it be more effective to attempt to build relationships WITH the CB
>members, rather than risk alienating them by ignoring the rules they voted
>in?
>
>Or am I just showing my naivete?
>
>Not arguing, just posing a question that occured to me....
>
>Bob Pastorello
>rcaerobob at cox.net
>www.rcaerobats.net
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Ferrell" <johnferrell at earthlink.net>
>To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 8:56 AM
>Subject: Re: rules proposals final result
>
>
>
>
>>Control freaks get pretty mad when you ignore them..Of course that is part
>>of the fun of ignoring them!
>>
>>But it is counter productive to injure the game.
>>
>>John Ferrell
>>http://DixieNC.US
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" <moleski at canisius.edu>
>>To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 7:35 AM
>>Subject: RE: rules proposals final result
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>--On Sunday, May 09, 2004 5:31 AM -0400 "Thomas C. Weedon"
>>>
>>>
>><weedon at wwnet.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>... take offs and landings are just as aerobatic as a loop of roll and
>>>>
>>>>
>>should be
>>
>>
>>>>judged as such.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Agreed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Perhaps AMA is pushing us back to the NPAC idea where we can be in
>>>>
>>>>
>>charge of our
>>
>>
>>>>own destiny; ya think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Yes, I do.
>>>
>>>The best thing to do with control freaks is to walk
>>>away from them.
>>>
>>>Marty
>>>=====================================
>>># To be removed from this list, go to
>>>
>>>
>http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>
>
>>>and follow the instructions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>=====================================
>># To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>and follow the instructions.
>>
>>
>>
>
>=====================================
># To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>and follow the instructions.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040509/62d87259/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list