rules proposals final result

[george kennie]

I, for one, contacted my Contest Board Member expressing my viewpoint on "all"
the proposals listed for consideration by the Board.
In my opinion, the Contest Board has demonstrated, by it's actions, that it is
definitely NOT "us"!!!!!

Lance Van Nostrand wrote:

> bob, I agree with you.  I wonder how many people actually contacted their
> AMA contest board member to remind them of the survey results and to
> represent?  We are in a volunteer organization where a few activists can
> have disproportionate influence.  This can be good or bad.
> --Lance
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Pastorello" <rcaerobob at cox.net>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 9:04 AM
> Subject: Re: rules proposals final result
>
> > Considering that many of the contest board members are "us", what would it
> > accomplish by negating their efforts, however we may feel about it?
> > Would not it be more effective to attempt to build relationships WITH the
> CB
> > members, rather than risk alienating them by ignoring the rules they voted
> > in?
> >
> > Or am I just showing my naivete?
> >
> > Not arguing, just posing a question that occured to me....
> >
> > Bob Pastorello
> > rcaerobob at cox.net
> > www.rcaerobats.net
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Ferrell" <johnferrell at earthlink.net>
> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 8:56 AM
> > Subject: Re: rules proposals final result
> >
> >
> > > Control freaks get pretty mad when you ignore them..Of course that is
> part
> > > of the fun of ignoring them!
> > >
> > > But it is counter productive to injure the game.
> > >
> > > John Ferrell
> > > http://DixieNC.US
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" <moleski at canisius.edu>
> > > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 7:35 AM
> > > Subject: RE: rules proposals final result
> > >
> > >
> > > > --On Sunday, May 09, 2004 5:31 AM -0400 "Thomas C. Weedon"
> > > <weedon at wwnet.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ... take offs and landings are just as aerobatic as a loop of roll
> and
> > > should be
> > > > > judged as such.
> > > >
> > > > Agreed.
> > > >
> > > > > Perhaps AMA is pushing us back to the NPAC idea where we can be in
> > > charge of our
> > > > > own destiny; ya think?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I do.
> > > >
> > > > The best thing to do with control freaks is to walk
> > > > away from them.
> > > >
> > > > Marty
> > > > =====================================
> > > > # To be removed from this list, go to
> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > > > and follow the instructions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, go to
> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > > and follow the instructions.
> > >
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > and follow the instructions.
> >
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.