rules proposals final result

[Bob Pastorello]

Considering that many of the contest board members are "us", what would it
accomplish by negating their efforts, however we may feel about it?
Would not it be more effective to attempt to build relationships WITH the CB
members, rather than risk alienating them by ignoring the rules they voted
in?

Or am I just showing my naivete?

Not arguing, just posing a question that occured to me....

Bob Pastorello
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Ferrell" <johnferrell at earthlink.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: rules proposals final result


> Control freaks get pretty mad when you ignore them..Of course that is part
> of the fun of ignoring them!
>
> But it is counter productive to injure the game.
>
> John Ferrell
> http://DixieNC.US
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Martin X. Moleski, SJ" <moleski at canisius.edu>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 7:35 AM
> Subject: RE: rules proposals final result
>
>
> > --On Sunday, May 09, 2004 5:31 AM -0400 "Thomas C. Weedon"
> <weedon at wwnet.net> wrote:
> >
> > > ... take offs and landings are just as aerobatic as a loop of roll and
> should be
> > > judged as such.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > > Perhaps AMA is pushing us back to the NPAC idea where we can be in
> charge of our
> > > own destiny; ya think?
> >
> > Yes, I do.
> >
> > The best thing to do with control freaks is to walk
> > away from them.
> >
> > Marty
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, go to
http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > and follow the instructions.
> >
> >
>
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.