Has any body seen this??? Comments?
JOddino
JOddino at socal.rr.com
Wed Mar 31 13:45:49 AKST 2004
Dean,
It can't be any better than the basic encoder and it looks to me like they are using the Futaba encoder and just replacing the RF module. I wonder how they do the decoder? You'd need a Futaba chip to do that.
A complete new system would be better because at 2.4 GHz they have plenty of bandwidth to increase the data rate and resolution.
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: Dean Pappas
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 12:49 PM
Subject: RE: Has any body seen this??? Comments?
Jim,
Do you know if the latency spec for SS is peak, or some average like RMS? These guys quote 14 mS.
This sounds fantastic, unless there is a real probability that when you stop a snap roll, the control surfaces may only get the information after 50 or more milliSeconds.
I'll just write them, I guess.
later,
Dean
-----Original Message-----
From: JOddino [mailto:JOddino at socal.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 3:45 PM
To: bnbsouthwell at avsia.com; discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Has any body seen this??? Comments?
There is someone flying a spread spectrum system here in Southern California, but I'm not sure this is the same thing. The local guy is supposedly using frequency hopping not DSSS. In any case it looks good for modelers if it works as advertised.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Southwell
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:06 AM
Subject: Has any body seen this??? Comments?
I saw this on another list and wondered if anyone had seen or heard of it. No frequency pins or getting shot down again...
Regards
Bill Southwell
http://www.modelavionics.com/WiFLi/default.asp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040331/393ef25c/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list