Artistic Aerobatics suggestions
Nat Penton
natpenton at centurytel.net
Mon Jan 26 22:14:40 AKST 2004
Eric, just making joke. I like the idea of a pilot choice manuever.
----- Original Message -----
From: Henderson,Eric
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 8:20 PM
Subject: RE: Artistic Aerobatics suggestions
Nat,
No blame being put on anyone... My push is to get you all to think about what we should be doing. and not whether an example of an idea from me is good or bad. Business-as-usual currently is on the decline.....!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Nat Penton
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 5:34 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Artistic Aerobatics suggestions
(Dont blame me, blame Eric ) If we eliminate an existing manuever in the upper classes and add a pilot choice manuever what would be the result ? (1) stimulate additional interest by commanding more attention to fellow flyers (2) enhance the general skill level over time (3) cause sandbagging - to achieve higher score (4) create additional judging considerations - complexity, originality (5) a judging solution might be to score only 0, 8,9 or 10 ----- Original Message -----
From: David Harmon
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 11:28 AM
Subject: RE: Artistic Aerobatics suggestions
I agree with the below...I think the AA idea is silly anyway as well as having an announcer for the 'spectators'.
These contests are not TOC type events that draw crowds from all over, these contests are local and interest in them will probably be limited as far as 'spectators' are concerned.
Regards
Dave Harmon
NSRCA 586
K6XYZ[at]comcast[dot]net
Torrance, Ca.
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of MargueriteVG at aol.com
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 7:14 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Artistic Aerobatics suggestions
less pattern contest events and split dedication because of a new "group" is one of the reasons why I agree that we should not move to quickly into Artistic Aerobatics if at all?
Marguerite
In a message dated 1/25/2004 7:42:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, Divesplat1 at msn.com writes:
I am also terribly against trying to have a freestyle, AA portion Sunday afternoon. Here is my reasoning.
1) Many contests we attend don't fly all 6 rounds as it is(this really upsets me even though I have driven a distance. Stay till 3 and finish the whole thing is my idea, but many differ.)
2) To add AA would only either extend the time people were there and still not finishing the pattern contests, or end up loosing more pattern contest for something new and different.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040127/5377d3a1/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list