Artistic Aerobatics suggestions

Nat Penton natpenton at centurytel.net
Mon Jan 26 22:14:40 AKST 2004


Eric, just making joke. I like the idea of a pilot choice manuever.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Henderson,Eric 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 8:20 PM
  Subject: RE: Artistic Aerobatics suggestions


  Nat,
         No blame being put on anyone... My push is to get you all to think about what we should be doing. and not whether an example of an idea from me is good or bad. Business-as-usual currently is on the decline.....!!!



  -----Original Message-----
  From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Nat Penton
  Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 5:34 PM
  To: discussion at nsrca.org
  Subject: Re: Artistic Aerobatics suggestions


  (Dont blame me, blame Eric )  If we eliminate an existing manuever in the upper classes and add a pilot choice manuever what would be the result ?  (1) stimulate additional interest by commanding more attention to fellow flyers (2)  enhance the general skill level over time  (3) cause sandbagging - to achieve higher score   (4) create additional judging considerations  -  complexity, originality (5) a judging solution might be to score only 0, 8,9 or 10 ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: David Harmon 
    To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 11:28 AM
    Subject: RE: Artistic Aerobatics suggestions


    I agree with the below...I think the AA idea is silly anyway as well as having an announcer for the 'spectators'.

    These contests are not TOC type events that draw crowds from all over, these contests are local and interest in them will probably be limited as far as 'spectators' are concerned.

     

    Regards

    Dave Harmon
    NSRCA 586
    K6XYZ[at]comcast[dot]net
    Torrance, Ca. 

    -----Original Message-----
    From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of MargueriteVG at aol.com
    Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 7:14 AM
    To: discussion at nsrca.org
    Subject: Re: Artistic Aerobatics suggestions

     

     less pattern  contest events and split dedication because of a new "group" is one of the reasons why I agree   that  we should not move to quickly into Artistic Aerobatics if at all?

    Marguerite

     

     

    In a message dated 1/25/2004 7:42:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, Divesplat1 at msn.com writes:

       

       

      I am also terribly against trying to have a freestyle, AA portion Sunday afternoon.  Here is my reasoning.

      1)  Many contests we attend don't fly all 6 rounds as it is(this really upsets me even though I have driven a distance.  Stay till 3 and finish the whole thing is my idea, but many differ.)

     

      2)  To add AA would only either extend the time people were there and still not finishing the pattern contests, or end up loosing more pattern contest for something new and different.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040127/5377d3a1/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list