Tonight's Dumb Idea...

Bob Pastorello rcaerobob at cox.net
Mon Feb 16 15:32:11 AKST 2004


Pretty high recommendation, Roberto!  I too, thought it SHOULD work, because it would seem there is a lot less wear and tear on the servo parts.  Probably just have to watch for overheating, and over-oiliing...

Bob Pastorello, Oklahoma
NSRCA 199, AMA 46373
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bob 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 6:30 PM
  Subject: Re: Tonight's Dumb Idea...


  Sure!

  It is the suggested method I give with my engine mounts.

  Sebastiano Silvestri gave me the idea. And it works flawlessly.

  The servo sure shakes a lot, but the relative motion between the servo arm ant the engine is none. So the servo lasts longer and the servo response to the engine is much more precise.

  Best Regards

  Roberto Bracchi - Modelcompositi


  ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Bob Pastorello 
    To: NSRCA 
    Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 1:19 AM
    Subject: Tonight's Dumb Idea...


    Okay - since you've opened it, read on :)

    Thinking of mounting an adequately-sized micro/mini servo directly to the beams of a motor mount to control my OS 1.60 on my experimental Arresti III....

    Anyone ever done this?

    (You may now stop laughing, and click on "Reply")

    Bob Pastorello, Oklahoma
    NSRCA 199, AMA 46373
    rcaerobob at cox.net
    www.rcaerobats.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040216/76ffc1aa/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list