Long - Snaps, setup, technique, and "tells" (Was Re: Snap Rolls.....are ...

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Dave, almost a treatise on the subject. Excellent stuff.
 
Matt
 
In a message dated 12/31/2004 11:31:50 AM Eastern Standard Time,  
ehaury at houston.rr.com writes:

Dave

Good descriptions. It is clear to me also that the more one  observes snaps - 
either by flying or judging - the more detail becomes  visible. These are not 
0 or 10 maneuvers (sorry Bob), but maneuvers with a  lot of things going on 
very rapidly. Only training and experience will  improve judging. OTOH, folks 
contributing to this thread seem to be much  more in agreement and the 
information much better quality that similar  threads in the past. Gee - 
stuff like this may make both flying and  judging better!

Earl
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David  Lockhart" <DaveL322 at comcast.net>
To:  <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 10:08  AM
Subject: Long - Snaps, setup, technique, and "tells" (Was Re: Snap  
Rolls.....are they legitimate/ RE: displacement during snap rolls  
discussion)


> Chris,
>
> I think Bjorn made an  extremely good point and analogy comparing the 3 pt
> shot to a  snap.  I think snaps are precision manuevers.  I don't think  
> luck
> with snaps is any different that luck with spin  entry/exits or stall turn
> entry/exits.  All are difficult to  consistently perform without downgrade
> (especially the snaps), and  that is generally reflected in the KFactor
> (oops, another can of  worms).


 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041231/f0dffffc/attachment.html