Displacement during snap rolls (was Why is it so quiet?)

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Au contraire Bobby, there are some features that facilitate a model's sheer  
acrobatic (note, not necessarily aerobatic; think twirls and twists, not 
ballet)  prowess. That is a totally different topic and we can take it up privately 
if  you like
 
Matt
 
 In a message dated 12/29/2004 8:03:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
rcaerobob at cox.net writes:

Matt, that comment makes perfect sense.
    But what design parameter would be changed to  limit/stop/defy the 
physical principles of inertia and momentum??
 
I don' thin' u'r gonna git ther'.....

Bob Pastorello
NSRCA 199  AMA 46373
_rcaerobob at cox.net_ (mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net) 
_www.rcaerobats.net_ (http://www.rcaerobats.net/) 
 
 

----- Original Message ----- 
From:  _Rcmaster199 at aol.com_ (mailto:Rcmaster199 at aol.com)  
To: _discussion at nsrca.org_ (mailto:discussion at nsrca.org)  
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 6:58  PM
Subject: Re: Displacement during snap  rolls (was Why is it so quiet?)



Wait a minute, we are not talking about flying Pattern with Decathlons  and 
Cubs. Pattern models are supposed to be "thoroughbred"  designs. We have very 
few limits as to what we actually design in. On  the other hand, Scale models 
don't have that "free to design as  you please" luxury. 
 
Pattern planes have no excuses. I see no reason the desired features  can't 
be designed in to facilitate desired outcome.
 
MattK
 
In a message dated 12/29/2004 5:10:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
d.pappas at kodeos.com writes:

Thanks Doug.
And yet we know that the full scale  guys' snaps happen in geologic time, 
compared to us!
Imagine the plight of diving  judges.
Maybe the solution is to "wimp-out"  the snap description, and allow anything 
that looks like a train wreck ...  NAAAAAH!






 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041230/e34dceee/attachment.html