Another "Looks About Right" 90 Size!!!

Randall Bearden rbearden56 at earthlink.net
Mon Dec 27 17:15:06 AKST 2004


On 12/27/04 12:47 PM, "Bill Glaze" <billglaze at triad.rr.com> wrote:

> Right, Del:
> With a price tag of just $700 for an already-covered highly competitive
> airframe, it's sure hard to beat.  Probably one of the big advantages is that
> it's designed and the construction is overseen by active pattern competition
> flyers.
> Just my opinion; worth what you paid for it.
> 
> Bill Glaze
> 
> Del Rykert wrote:
>>  Message    
>> With a reasonable price tag.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>     
>>  
>>>  
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>  
>>> From: Lee Davis <mailto:lee at piedmontmodels.com>
>>>  
>>> To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>>  
>>> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:48 AM
>>>  
>>> Subject: RE: Another "Looks About Right" 90 Size!!!
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> "alacrity"  WTG!
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> One word answer: weight.  It's tough to manufacture a 2M plane at legal
>>> weight.  From what I've seen I'm not sure anyone will "get it" and figure
>>> out how the Focus II came in at 10lbs or less.
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Lee Davis
>>>  
>>> Piedmont Models
>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> If you "have" to have a 2M plane, how come all these manufacturers are
>>>> cranking out these 90 -size ARF's with such alacrity???
>>>>    
>>>> 
>>>> Bob Pastorello
>>>> NSRCA 199  AMA 46373
>>>>  rcaerobob at cox.net
>>>>  www.rcaerobats.net <http://www.rcaerobats.net>
>>>>    
>>>>  
>>>>    
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>  
> 

Where did you get $700 from?  The add had $349 for the price.  It looks like
for just under 1K total you could be in the air and ready to compete.  Spend
the other 351 on fuel, props, and contest costs.  I have that much in my
Epsilon but I enjoy building as much as flying.  Anybody know anything about
the Viper G202?  Would like to do that next.

Randall


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041228/e1353863/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list