EGGNOG and OnLine Voting

[Mark Hunt]

mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......coooookiees.....

merry xmas to all,
Mark

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Randy" <randy10926 at comcast.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 5:39 PM
Subject: EGGNOG and OnLine Voting


> Sure tastes good.
> Randy
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Atwood, Mark" <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 5:37 PM
> Subject: RE: cookies and OnLine Voting
>
>
> You guys are KILLIN me.  Every time I see this subject I end up eating 
> another Christmas Cookie...  You need a new subject!   And NOT "Eggnog and 
> Online Voting" either....
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org on behalf of John Ferrell
> Sent: Fri 12/24/2004 5:34 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: cookies and OnLine Voting
>
>
> I agree. However, there is a privacy problem be it real or percieved.
> When a database is shared there is always the possibility of having it 
> misused.
>
> Many of us are indifferent to who keeps track of us but many others are 
> very sensitive about that. I feel less anonymity would make for a 
> "cleaner" world!
>
> I think there ought to be a law forbidding databases that won't output 
> CSV!
>
> John Ferrell
> http://DixieNC.US
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Bob Pastorello <mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net>
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 5:00 AM
> Subject: Re: cookies and OnLine Voting
>
>
> What we need, and I first tried to get when a District VP in '99, is the 
> actual participation  information from AMA.  If we had that databaae, 
> annually dumped as a single csv, there are those around (me, for one) who 
> could do data comparisons to determine some answers...How many actual 
> individuals play?  What classes?  How many contests per player?  Compare 
> querying against NSRCA databases would give the REAL "percent of 
> participants who are NSRCA members", and then by class.
>    Which also could be information mined for recruiting, feedback, 
> direction, and of course, RULE MAKING.
>
> In '99, the AMA  IT guy told me "we (AMA) can't get it out of the 
> computers".... maybe 5 years is enough time to make it possible?  Officer 
> elects/candidates - you have at least ONE volunteer to do the database 
> crunching if you can get it.  I'd bet there are others, too.
>
> Bob Pastorello
> NSRCA 199  AMA 46373
> rcaerobob at cox.net
> www.rcaerobats.net
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Ed Hartley <mailto:roho2 at rcpattern.com>
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 10:52 PM
> Subject: Re: cookies and OnLine Voting
>
> At the moment I type this there are 404 members on the discussion list. I
> don't know how many of these belong to NSRCA.
>
> Ed Hartley
> roho2 at rcpattern.com
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Grow Pattern" <pattern4u at comcast.net>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 11:41 PM
> Subject: Re: cookies and OnLine Voting
>
>
>> Steve,
>>           If the current member number is, say 600 plus,  how many do you
>> think are on the discussion list?  I heard about 200. If that is right
>> then we need to design a system that reaches more than just this e-mail
>> list.
>>
>> Just thinking out loud,
>>
>> Eric.
>
>
>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
> 


=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.