Lamar's Answers to Troy
Maureen Dunphy
mdunphy at avsia.com
Fri Dec 17 17:12:31 AKST 2004
I see the one thing I should have added to the NSRCA History at www.nsrca.org was the number of contestants at each NATS and N-Pac. Maybe I can still go back and find that info. Anyway, my files are in storage right now, but we had way over 90 at each N-PAC. I believe the second was over 150 pilots and the first was close to that. I'll try to find the exact figures.
Maureen
----- Original Message -----
From: Fletcher, Richard
To: 'discussion at nsrca.org'
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 5:19 PM
Subject: RE: Lamar's Answers to Troy
The turnout and enthusiasm was huge. Every pilot I spoke to told me they had
a great time at these contests. I think they got about 90 pilots at each.
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 6:15 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Lamar's Answers to Troy
On Dec 17, 2004, at 4:55 PM, Fletcher, Richard wrote:
> Does anyone remember the N-PAC contest in the early 90s?
I certainly do. NSRCA hosted two N-PAC contests in the 1990's. The
first was at Lawrenceville, IL and co-CD'd by Mike Dunphy and Jim Fife.
The second was at Tullahoma, TN and CD'd by Mike Dunphy.
We hosted the N-PAC contests to demonstrate to AMA that we were willing
to and fully capable of hosting our own national championships. The
N-PAC contests were instrumental in convincing AMA to let us run our
event at the Nats. Other SIGs followed in running their events at the
Nats..
Ron Van Putte
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
> Behalf Of Jim Ivey
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 5:53 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Re: Lamar's Answers to Troy
>
>
>
>> MattK
> In my days of controline stunt the Navy hosted the Nats and that was
> the
> reason they could be moved across the country. Without some sponsors
> of this
> magnitude I think it would not be do-able on our budgets. Careful
> thought is
> needed here. (like you said)
>
> Jim Ivey
>
>
>> From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com
>> Date: 2004/12/17 Fri AM 10:04:41 EST
>> To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> Subject: Re: Lamar's Answers to Troy
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 12/17/2004 12:16:35 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>> derekkoopowitz at earthlink.net writes:
>>
>>
>> Geography issue with regard to the Nats? Ideally I'd like to rotate
>> the Nats away from Muncie every other year - move it West one year,
>> back to
> Muncie,
>> and then East the following year. Whether AMA goes for this... I
>> don't
> know
>> but it is something that we need to at least talk about. Surveying
>> the
>> membership to get their opinion on this is critical - we've managed
>> to
> maintain
>> attendance at the Nats for the past 7-8 years but I think we can do
>> better
> -
>> even if it increases by 10 or 15 that is a huge increase in
>> attendance.
>>
>> Hopefully I answered the questions... if not, let me know.
>>
>> -Derek (your ex-K-Factor editor) :)
>>
>>
>>
>> Derek, I personally like the idea of a rotating Nats as a means to an
>> end--greater exposure to folks that may not be able to come to a Nats
> otherwise.
>> The positive may be that Nats organizers for the Muncie facility will
>> then
> have
>> an extra 4 days to do with as they please, 2 out 3 years. What isn't
>> as
>> certain is what would we require of Nats organizers during those
>> periods
>> (manpower, equipment, or other logistics issues like finding suitable
> sites and having
>> AMA distribute the paperwork), and whether AMA would be willing to
>> help
> us.
>>
>> If we did not need any help with anything during the off Muncie site
>> years, I think they would buy in. This needs careful thought
>>
>> best regards and happy holidays
>>
>> MattK
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to
> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to
> http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041218/13b1d40e/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list