Lamar's Answers to Troy

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Yes I remember that time. N-PAC was quite successful at changing some  
attitudes at headquarters as I recall. 
 
MattK
 
In a message dated 12/17/2004 5:56:24 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
Richard.Fletcher at gs.com writes:

Does  anyone remember the N-PAC contest in the early  90s?


Rich




-----Original Message-----
From:  discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]  On
Behalf Of Jim Ivey
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 5:53 PM
To:  discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Re: Lamar's Answers to  Troy



>  MattK
In my days of controline stunt the  Navy hosted the Nats and that was the
reason they could be moved across the  country. Without some sponsors of this
magnitude I think it would not be  do-able on our budgets. Careful thought is
needed here.  (like you  said)

Jim Ivey


> From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com
> Date:  2004/12/17 Fri AM 10:04:41 EST
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
>  Subject: Re: Lamar's Answers to Troy
> 
>  
> In a  message dated 12/17/2004 12:16:35 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>  derekkoopowitz at earthlink.net writes:
> 
>  
> Geography  issue with  regard to the Nats?  Ideally I'd like to rotate 
>  the
> Nats away from Muncie  every other year - move it West one  year, back to
Muncie, 
> and then East the  following  year.  Whether AMA goes for this... I don't
know 
> but it  is  something that we need to at least talk about.  Surveying the  
> membership  to get their opinion on this is critical - we've  managed to
maintain  
> attendance at the Nats for the past 7-8  years but I think we can do better
-  
> even if it increases by  10 or 15 that is a huge increase in  attendance.
>  
>  Hopefully I answered  the questions... if not, let me know.
>   
> -Derek (your  ex-K-Factor editor)  :)
> 
>  
> 
> Derek, I personally like the idea of a rotating Nats as a  means to an
> end--greater exposure to folks that may not be able to  come to a Nats
otherwise.  
> The positive may be that Nats  organizers for the Muncie facility will then
have  
> an extra 4  days to do with as they please, 2 out 3 years. What isn't as 
>  certain  is what would we require of Nats organizers during those periods  
> (manpower,  equipment, or other logistics issues like finding  suitable
sites and having 
> AMA  distribute the paperwork), and  whether AMA would be willing to help
us. 
>  
> If we did  not need any help with anything during the off Muncie site 
>  years,
> I think they would buy in. This needs careful  thought
>  
> best regards and happy holidays
>   
> MattK


 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041217/7856df29/attachment.html