[SPAM] TS 91

[rcaerobob at cox.net]

Which is EXACTLY why the ST 2300 is on it's way, and I'll hang the leftover KS canister (non tuned) to make it cleaner and quiet.  I figure it will perform adequately.  Right on, Dean.

The TS91 appeared to be (and perform) just like the OS 91FX.  The difference was a lack of obscene vertical, which is what I "need" (like).  The ST will do that.
> 
> From: "Dean Pappas" <d.pappas at kodeos.com>
> Date: 2004/12/13 Mon AM 11:23:59 EST
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Subject: RE: [SPAM] TS 91
> 
> A muffled two-stroke 120 on the Excelleron is just the right amount of horesepower: it's enough to cleanly fly through Masters or FAI,
> and underclassmen should have that much power available, so they can "fly the maneuver, not the plane".
>  
> end of soapbox
>  
> 
> Dean Pappas 
> Sr. Design Engineer 
> Kodeos Communications 
> 111 Corporate Blvd. 
> South Plainfield, N.J. 07080 
> (908) 222-7817 phone 
> (908) 222-2392 fax 
> d.pappas at kodeos.com 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of randy10926 at comcast.net
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 11:20 AM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org @nsrca.
> Subject: [SPAM] TS 91
> 
> 
> Bob
> You still using a TS91 on your Excelleron.  Any different than the OS91?
>  
> You really going for a ST2300.  It should hover nice.
>  
> Randy
> 
> 
> 

Bob Pastorello, El Reno, OK, USA
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.