Digital / standare Servo question (HITEC)
Wayne Galligan
wgalligan at goodsonacura.com
Mon Dec 6 14:43:32 AKST 2004
If you don't have a programmer for these HiTec servo's could that make a
difference in the resolution around center? Like can you change certain
aspects of the servo's operation related to centering, I think they call
that adjusting the deadband.
Wayne G.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at cox.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Cc: "John Fuqua" <johnfuqua at gdsys.net>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Digital / standare Servo question (HITEC)
On Dec 6, 2004, at 4:27 PM, vicenterc at comcast.net wrote:
> I have a related question.
>
> What is the experience (good or bad) using HITEC servos in pattern?
>
> Clearly they have options and are definitively cheaper than other
> brands (JR and Futaba). Any feedback is welcome.
I have been using Hitec digital servos for the past three years. In my
Advantage I have used two 5625 servos (one on each elevator half), two
5245 servos (one on each aileron and one 5925 on rudder. They have all
given me flawless service and seem to track and center as well as they
did when I installed them.
My flying companion, John Fuqua used the same control surface setup as
mine on a Focus for two years. When he retired the Focus this summer
in favor of a Temptation, he went with 5245s on each elevator half and
each aileron and a 5925 on rudder. He is a better pilot than me and
can afford more expensive servos, but continues to use Hitec digital
servos.
Ron Van Putte
================To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list