Excelleron Closer

[Ron Van Putte]

On Dec 2, 2004, at 8:38 PM, Bob Pastorello wrote:

> Magnum 1.20 looked SO BAD (poor finish, casting, machining) plus it 
> was missing the carb!!!  So it went back home.
>     Will try the Tiger Shark 91.  IF it's too puny, I'll do the Tiger 
> Shark 1.20...these are very nice looking inside and out!

My only experience with Tiger Shark engines was with the .40.  It 
was/is a very powerful engine.  The early engines were so powerful and 
the con rod was so puny that you had to use at least a 10x7 or 11x6 
prop or excessive top end RPM would cause the con rod to fail in 
spectacular fashion.

Ron Van Putte

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 756 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20041203/2a2683ec/attachment.bin