A possible answer to lousy judging "Flash cards"

[Alan Hewson]

Del
For a second there I thought you were kidding. <grin>
Alan
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Del K. Rykert 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 8:07 PM
  Subject: Re: A possible answer to lousy judging "Flash cards"


  I learned that a long time ago it was smarter to bribe the scribes rather than the judges. Scribes were cheaper too...  (4 those 2 serious this was said tongue firmly planted in cheek...)

                     del 
                 NSRCA - 473
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: MargueriteVG at aol.com 
    To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 7:32 PM
    Subject: Re: A possible answer to lousy judging "Flash cards"


       James  
     I have seen that also.  

     We have to use scribes that really know what is expected and how important these scores are to the pilots. I

    The question is how do we get scribes that are trained and responsible. that is difficult unless they are pilots.  It is very sad when a pilot has to scribe judge and fly at a contest. 

     It really is not as simple  as  "just write down what I tell you" Man

    When its 100 degrees out and we need scribes many are asked to help that are not really ready to scribe.  I often wonder was it the Judge or the scribe  that wrote that outrageous O or 5 when it should have been a 9  :-)


    . We really do not have an answer yet.  Perhaps we might have some of the sophisticated suggestions made on the subject put into action. Research the idea. An extra dollar or two from each contest to work on an electronic program. A committee  could be set up with the  NSRCA
    Might take awhile but its a move towards a solution. Lets face it the score a scribe writes down decides the winner.
    Marguerite


    In a message dated 4/19/2004 5:51:39 PM Eastern Standard Time, James.Woodward2 at edwards.af.mil writes:
      I know I'm way-late on this thread however, the use of a scribe does not in
      itself guarantee better judging.  Just this weekend, we/I witnessed judges
      using scribes for Masters & FAI, looking "down" to tell the scribe what the
      score is..... it was kind of funny to watch.  In fact, given that they were
      looking down before the use of a scribe, the addition of a scribe only
      increase the chances of errors, as they (still looking down), had to
      transfer information to another person.
      Jim W.


      -----Original Message-----
      From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On
      Behalf Of Ed Miller
      Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:43 PM
      To: discussion at nsrca.org
      Subject: Re: A possible answer to lousy judging "Flash cards"

      Well, you are in charge of judging at the BDS contest so go for it.
      Personally, since we have so few spectators at a contest I don't see who it
      is benefiting. IMHO seems like we've found a lot of answers for an
      unnecessary question. If all this would lead to eliminating the scribe,
      helping judges judge better and helping the CD the day of the event I'd be
      all for it. The hand signals to the scribe and the judge placing the scores
      on a separate sheet to then be transferred to the official score sheet to me
      is a classic example of complicating a simple task. The only way to
      eliminate scribes is for every judge to know by heart every sequence of
      every class by heart, not realistic. Short of an electronic scoring device,
      I don't see anything here that is simple enough to have repeatable, 100%
      correct results. We ought to focus our energy on preparing better judges and
      simplifying and clarifying maneuver descriptions so there is no room for
      interpretation.
      Ed M.

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: "Anthony Romano" <anthonyr105 at hotmail.com>
      To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
      Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 12:57 PM
      Subject: Re: A possible answer to lousy judging "Flash cards"

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040419/6b9eb234/attachment.html