Snaps

Dennis Cone cone.man at verizon.net
Tue Apr 13 18:00:26 AKDT 2004


Hang in their Steve. Your right. If you change the pitch by adding elevator
first then it cannot be a simultaneous maneuver. It becomes one input
followed by another. There is no way this can be defined as simultaneous.

Dennis Cone


-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
Behalf Of RC Steve Sterling
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:42 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: RE: Snaps

Read my 2nd and 3rd paragraphs. Certainly, the follow-on paragraphs still do
not mention "before", "prior", "do this first", it only says there must be a
break on initiation. It does not preclude the simultaneous autorotation.

Sorry, you can't redefine the word simultaneous.
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
Behalf Of Patternrules at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:14 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Snaps
In a message dated 4/13/2004 8:06:56 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
rcsteve at tcrcm.org writes:
NOWHERE does it use the word "before" or "prior". It says
"Snap Roll is the simultaneous, rapid autorotation in the pitch, yaw and
roll axes of flight...."
 Don't stop reading as so many do, this is the next sentence.

 1. Since the maneuver is defined as a stall maneuver
(initiated by a rapid stall of the wing induced
by a change in pitch attitude), the nose of the
fuselage should show a definite break from the
flight path in the direction of the snap (positive
or negative) while the track closely maintains
the flight path.



Steve Maxwell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20040413/9c349e86/attachment.html


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list