*SPAM* Re: Re: Throw snap rolls out!!!!!!

[Del K. Rykert]

And I have seen those judges occasionally miss a zeroed maneuver that was
presented. That isn't measured by the formula either...

                         del
               NSRCA - 473

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Atwood, Mark" <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:48 AM
Subject: RE: *SPAM* Re: Re: Throw snap rolls out!!!!!!


I hate to be cynical...but the math behind the statistical evaluation
heavily rewards a steady stream of 8's.  I'm not sure that's the best
measure...

-Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: vanputte at cox.net [mailto:vanputte at cox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 8:41 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: *SPAM* Re: Re: Throw snap rolls out!!!!!!



>
> From: "John Ferrell" <johnferrell at earthlink.net>
> Date: 2004/04/12 Mon PM 09:03:32 EDT
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: Throw snap rolls out!!!!!!
>
> I do a lot of scoring. You would be surprised how few times the judges
disagree by more than two points.
> When they get to the point where they disagree by 1 point, I think we
should just use one judge....

The top ranked judges in the NSRCA judge evaluation program have point
discrepancies of less than 1/2 point per maneuver.

Ron Van Putte
============# To be removed from this list, go to
http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.




=====================================
# To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.