Snap Switch

Karl G. Mueller kgamueller at rogers.com
Mon Apr 12 13:38:48 AKDT 2004


Ron,

You're correct on the snap switch timing on the 512 PCM. You could
time the length ( duration ) of the snap without having to release the
snap switch.
Since FAI rules state that you're not allowed to use any timed devices,
this feature was later removed from the transmitter by Futaba.

Karl G. Mueller
kgamueller at rogers.com



----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ronlock at comcast.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: Snap Switch


> Quite right on the judging difficulties Gray.
>
> About switch timing- Seems like I heard that the early
> Futaba 512 PCM had a timing capability, that was
> subsequently dissabled.  Anyone confirm that?
>
> Such timing functions are not legal according to pattern rules.
>
> later, Ron Lockhart
>
>
> >Good Point, but unfortunately judging snaps is difficult, and then
educating all the judges is even more difficult. Having the nads to zero
people due to "not real snaps" is also difficult.  Even the people who have
said nads for zeroing an Advanced flyer may exhibit shrinkage when it comes
to zeroing a top level FAI dude, whom to me seem to have the best ability to
fudge a snap where you wonder....was that a snap (must have been right? he's
a TOP flyer!)? I too hate to be in that position.  This has been discussed
at length before.
> Also remember that I think some radios have a delay that when you hit the
switch it can be programmed to feed certain control surfaces first-I am nuts
on this?
>
> Gray Fowler
> Principal Chemical Engineer
> Composites Engineering <
>
> -------------------------------
>  vicenterc at comcast.net
> Sent by: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> 04/12/2004 12:47 PM
> Please respond to discussion
>         To:        discussion at nsrca.org
>         cc:        "Wayne Galligan" <wgalligan at goodsonacura.com>,
<discussion at nsrca.org>
>         Subject:        Re: Snap Switch
>
> I remember that we discussed this before.  According with the rule book
the pilot have to show a definitive brake before the snap.  It is very
difficult to do this with the snap switch alone unless you are very fast and
do the break first and then use the snap switch just after. I agree that the
snap done by hand is a lot better and under control.  My personal experience
is that if I try to break first the snap is a lot better.  I agree that is
very difficult to judge.
>
> I know that several top pilots got "zeros" at the world championship.  I
am guessing that they didn't show a definitive break before the snap. Tony
Stillam: Do you know?
>
> Regards,
>
> Vicente Bortone
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list