QUEST update

[Henderson,Eric]

I bought it from Michael Laggis who posted it on this list.


-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of randy10926 at comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:18 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: RE: QUEST update


where did you get the YS 110 from?

Randy
> I now have two Quests. One is being fitted with the YS 110, That way I will have 
> data on the YS 91, 110 and 140 powered versions. Anyone with a 1.20 FZ running 
> one out there?.
> 
> The YS 91 version was great to fly. I modified it to take the 1.40 (1.20 AC's 
> too heavy IMHO) and I did not have a 110 at the time. I have seen a 1.20 OS 4-c 
> version and a 91 OS 2-c version. I have had a few calls about the old YS 91 AC's 
> not behaving well but no complaints about the flying capabilities of the plane.
> 
> One guy lost his canopy. I do and also advise gluing it on with RC56 and ironing 
> on a trim strip to keep it in place. Both the std gear supplied and my old 
> Bolly's continue to work well. I do now advise adding (I may have already) a 
> 1/8-3/16" hard ply plate on top of the original gear plate to prevent pull 
> through. I also fit 1/8" lite ply doublers before and aft of the front wing 
> former - call it instinct. (I have picture if that I can e-mail direct - the 
> list won't take them)
> 
> All in all the plane continues to be an excellent flyer. I asked Don Szczur to 
> fly it at Arcola this year. He increased all the throws and was  very 
> comfortable with it. Maybe he can comment on the flying - he needed more 
> elevator that I had mechanically not allowed for.
> 
> I let an IMAC pilot fly it and he found it too smooth and boring for his tastes 
> - fine by me :-)
> 
> My plane still has no Knife edge or down line problems and runs with no 
> corrective mixes, even though it is a bit nose heavy with the 1.40.
> 
> BTW - you do NOT need a 1.40 on the front. The vertical is obscene and it will 
> teach you bad habits. A 91 FZ (Note FZ), a 110 or a 1.20 FZ. Saito 100 etc. are 
> very good. An OS 91 Surpass will do it for 401/402 but does not have the up-line 
> grunt if you want to fly big. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Eric.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Larry Caldwell
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 12:10 AM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: QUEST update
> 
> 
> Any more thoughts on the Quest now that you have had it a while?
> I'm looking to buy a 90 size pattern plane to begin in Sportsman.
> Right now it's a toss-up between the Quest and a Zimpro Viper 90FG.
> 
> Larry
> 
> Henderson,Eric wrote:
> >  The Quest continues to be put through the wringer!
> >  
> > With 38 more flights on it I have only had to tighten the tailwheel wire 
> > in the rudder. A few drops of Zap did the trick.
> >  
> > The throttle hook up has not been very well behaved. Against my better 
> > judgement I used an EZ connector at the throttle arm end. The first 
> > failure was on the ground, while tethered. Full rpm on engine start. 
> > Saved the day by backing out the needle until the engine quit. The black 
> > keeper washer had come off. Fitted a new one. 12 flights later the darn 
> > thing came off in the air. The brass part must have also been worn,
> >  
> > 11 minutes of full bore flying later it ran out of gas.
> >  
> > All I could do was fly large horizontal figure 8's until tank empty 
> > status occurred. Boy does that tire you out! You dare not gain height 
> > nor can you roll much at that speed.
> >  
> > Good news is that the plane held together at a faster than I would ever 
> > fly it speed. Two bits of trim began to peel but will be re-ironed 
> > tonight. Wing and fuse and elevator/ rudder all behaved flawlessly 
> > during the un-planned  "stress-test".  Pilot was not so firm afterwards.
> >  
> > Throttle wire hook up will be replaced with my own system tomorrow.
> >  
> > I am currently flying the plane with all controls 40% below the minimum 
> > recommended and it will roll and snap and spin in a very happy manner, 
> > No KE or down line mixes have been found to be necessary. One cool thing 
> > is that the plane will do real square KE loops. On the down line you go 
> > to full rudder and blip the gas and there you are flying level. To much 
> > fun for one guy!
> >  
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Eric. 
> 
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to 
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> 
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to 
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> 
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#

==================# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#