tuned pipe for os 91 fx ??
francisco gonzalez
proesco at decoarq.com
Mon Sep 8 20:02:35 AKDT 2003
Ihncheol
thanks for your help , i will try the Macs header and
Macs 90 size tuned pipe
francisco
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 23:25:04 -0700, "Ihncheol Park"
wrote:
>
> Francisco,
>
> 91SX-H is rated for 2.9HP compared to 91FX with 2.8.
> 91SX-H is about 6 mm short in the front and has
> standard needle valve (no
> remote needle valve), longer throttle control lever
> (not close to the carb.
> the lever is about 1 inch out from the carb body).
>
> Explorer is 1700mm x 1700mm. Mine is a fixed gear
> version that should weigh
> around 3600grams.
>
> Ihncheol Park
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
> francisco gonzalez
> Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 7:42 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: RE: tuned pipe for os 91 fx ??
>
>
>
> hi Ihncheol Park
>
> thanks for your help , i see you use 91SX-H this is
> different engine of the fx ??? , how large is the
> explorer 90 ??
> thanks
> francisco
>
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 17:30:36 -0700, "Ihncheol Park"
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Francisco,
> >
> > There are two possible methods.
> >
> > 1. Side mount the engine and use one of the Macs
> > product header.
> > 2. Invert mount the engine and use a custom header
> from
> > Karl Mueller.
> >
> > Karl Mueller does the best job in custom header. I
> got
> > one for my JR Propo
> > Explorer V90 to use with 91SX-H.
> >
> > Once you decided how the engine goes on, you should
> > have no problem mounting
> > the pipe. (Macs 90 size tuned pipe).
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > Ihncheol Park
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
> > francisco gonzalez
> > Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 9:14 AM
> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > Subject: tuned pipe for os 91 fx ??
> >
> >
> > Hi, I plan to install a tuned pipe for a os max 91
fx
> > in the new Quest plane , what is the better way ??
> > francisco
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the
> > body.
> > #
> >
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the
> > body.
> > #
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the
> body.
> #
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the
> body.
> #
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list