Pattern & IMAC 2003 Nationals articles in AMA Mag.

[rcaerobob at cox.net]

EXACTLY.  And many of the non-competitive folks DO, and ARE, voicing their discontent with that investment.  If any of you want a few days worth of reading, drop by the RC Universe forum on "AMA".  You'll probably be surprised at what the rank and file folks have on their minds.  I was.
   It is a pretty complex issue, and has lots of widely varying perspectives.  Ours is but ONE.
> 
> From: "Gray E Fowler" <gfowler at raytheon.com>
> Date: 2003/10/30 Thu AM 11:55:16 EST
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: RE: Pattern & IMAC 2003 Nationals articles in AMA Mag.
> 
> RC Bob
> 
> While you are correct that the AMA is not "competition support" directly 
> why did they build and cost us the AMA members huge sums of money for a 
> multi faceted site that greatly out paces the need for non competiton 
> flying demand-if not for competition.
> 
> While pattern guys are a small percentage, we have a much larger 
> percentage of people who use Muncie than the percentage of non competition 
> types......
> 
> So how much has the AMA spent on the National site? Tell that to the non 
> competiton type and he should be outraged also, knowing he will never 
> compete.
> 
> 
> 
> Gray Fowler
> Principal Chemical Engineer
> Composites Engineering
> 

Bob Pastorello, El Reno, OK, USA
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20031030/b5406594/reply.html