Pattern & Imac 2003 Nationals articles in AMA Mag.

[rwantz2 at comcast.net]

Wasn't there a noise rule enforced at this year's IMAC NATS?  Possibly this held back many IMAC participants for fear that they wouldn't pass.  ???

Bob W.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:13 PM
  Subject: Re: Pattern & Imac 2003 Nationals articles in AMA Mag.


  Ken very interesting and valid points all. 
  In particular, the great number of meets that IMAC enjoys now, reminds me of how pattern was about 20 years. As of last count, I think there were about a dozen IMAC events in Florida alone, or about twice as many Pattern events.

  The fact that the IMAC Nats only had 37 entries this year, I don't believe reflects the relative participation in this area of the hobby in general. Dare it be said that the AMA Nats appears to be less important to IMAC than the professional events are? The Nats isn't  a money event like the other  national events you mentioned. I have to think that the IMAC people would rather win some real money or substantial prizes when they do well. 

  We in pattern would probably do the same if the opportunity ever presented itself. As far as I recall, Pattern has never had that kind of support from the Industry as IMAC is enjoying right now. It's also true that the Industry is considerably larger now than 20 years ago by a wide margin, so more marketing folks are willing to invest more up front for bigger returns later. The fact that the IMAC style planes seem to have proliferated every club in a big way, just makes this part of the pie very large, and affords that kind of support.

  When I see that some of the high level events you mention give away as much as 20,000$ worth of cash and prizes, it's small wonder they draw 70+ pilots.

  Right now, the Pattern Nats is the biggest event the Pattern folks have, and it means alot to those who compete to win trophies. If the same Marketing people supported some key Pattern events around the country in a similar way, would the Pattern Nats have the same meaning?? I haftawonder

  Matt K



    Subj:Re: Pattern & Imac 2003 Nationals articles in AMA Mag. 
    Date:10/29/2003 12:36:06 PM Eastern Standard Time
    From:rcplanefan at yahoo.com
    Reply-to:discussion at nsrca.org
    To:discussion at nsrca.org
    Sent from the Internet 



    George and all,

    This is my first post on this forum as I've been
    lurking for a while.  I currently fly IMAC and have
    for the past 3 years.  I have never flown pattern,
    though I am interested in getting started.  I chose to
    fly IMAC because I like the "scale looking" airplanes
    and love competitive aerobatics.  I just wanted to
    make a couple of comments on your post.

    First of all, I didn't attend the NATS this year which
    kind of sucks because I live in Cincinnati and would
    have only had about a 2 or 3 hour drive.  However,
    there were 21 IMAC contests in my region (North
    Central) during this past season.  All of these
    contests occur on weekends and, as a result, require
    that I take no vacation from work to attend.  The
    average attendance was about 20 people--some had many
    more than 30, a few had less than 20.  So, at least in
    my region, the competitive circuit is full.  The NATS
    would have required taking the better part of a week
    away from work.  Nah, for me I can compete in 15-20
    contests during the spring, summer, and fall.  No need
    to skip a week of work for the NATS.

    Economic reasons?  Well, this has been said many times
    before, but the top-of-the-line IMAC plane really
    doesn't cost any more that a top-of-the-line pattern
    plane.  I don't think that "most" IMAC guys have
    planes worth >$7500.  I personally know very few. 
    However, most of the competitive planes are large. 
    Ever tried to ship one of these via the airlines? 
    Can't be done.  Which means you have to drive to the
    contest--usually towing a trailer, or ship in a crate.
    Not alot of guys in California who want to do either
    (and I don't blame them).

    The IMAC NATS to me is really just another contest. 
    And I have so many to choose from that don't require a
    week away, that I chose to skip.  You are correct
    about one thing--the article certainly won't help
    future NATS attendence.  But there are plenty of other
    "national" level contests to attend--the Joe Nall
    Masters, JR Challenge, and Tuscon Shootout to name a
    few.

    Anyway, I hope you guys realize that IMAC is really
    the same type of guys as pattern flying competitive
    aerobatics with a different type of plane.  Same goal
    in mind, though--precision flight.  Please don't get
    an "us vs. them" thing going.  This is supposed to be
    fun--it sure a hell is for me!

    Ken McGuire


    --- george kennie <geobet at gis.net> wrote:
    > Boy, I had a similar reaction. After all the hype
    > over the last several
    > years about how Imac is the fastest growing venue of
    > the sport, they had
    > a total head count of 37??? C'mon, at a Nationals
    > event???????????  As
    > far as representatives of a SIG, it appears that
    > they had absolutely
    > zero support people. You can't feel that this is due
    > to some economic
    > condition, as all these guys seem to have airplanes
    > in the >$7500
    > category. It also sounds like they do not have a
    > judging program to
    > certify potential judges, as there were many
    > complaints regarding unfair
    > scoring awards, resulting in many pilots realizing
    > that they had been
    > unduly cheated.
    > The overall tenor of the entire meet seemed to have
    > a great black pall
    > decend upon Muncie for the duration of their event
    > with nobody leaving
    > for home with a good feeling.
    > This report certainly does not bode well as an
    > encouraging carrot
    > regarding future attendance.
    > Their venue appears to require a super shot in the
    > arm of administrative
    > influx, if they are going to survive in a manner
    > capable of sustaining
    > any number base.
    > It's very SAD!!!!!!!!
    > Georgie



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20031030/aa2f2dd0/attachment.html