Schedules Old Geezer's proposal

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Now you are talking good buddy. I like that for me too


> Subj:Re: Schedules Old Geezer's proposal 
> Date:10/27/2003 5:11:38 PM Eastern Standard Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net">rcaerobob at cox.net</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> Great idea, Eric!  But I'd prefer we KEEP the turnarounds, and throw away 
> the center maneuvers....those are the ones that near-geezers struggle with the 
> most??? <VBG>
> 
> > 
> > From: "Henderson,Eric" <Eric.Henderson at gartner.com>
> > Date: 2003/10/27 Mon PM 04:44:51 EST
> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > Subject: Schedules Old Geezer's proposal
> > 
> > A neat way to do this is have a class within a class, Still fly any class 
> just the way we always have, BUT modify the scoring program to ignore the 
> turnarounds for the OG's (Old Guys/Geezers)
> >  
> > then they would compete with each other with center maneuvers - a.k.a. 
> maneuvers that they can see more clearly. 
> >  
> > You would have the normal 1,2 and 3rd stuff with another contest within 
> the class for 1,2 etc between the old ones....
> >  
> >  
> > Regards,
> >  
> > Almost old - Eric.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20031027/3b100bd4/attachment.html