Schedules Old Geezer's proposal
jim ivey
jivey61 at msn.com
Mon Oct 27 13:46:49 AKST 2003
Ha, You can never tell who lurks in the dark shadows.
Hi Steve.
Jim I
jivey61 at msn.com
>From: "spbyrum" <spbyrum at hiwaay.net>
>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>Subject: RE: Schedules Old Geezer's proposal
>Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:21:50 -0600
>
>Now you done it, Ivey.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
>On Behalf Of jim ivey
>Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 4:16 PM
>To: discussion at nsrca.org
>Subject: Re: Schedules Old Geezer's proposal
>
>E'
>If you ignore the end box maneuvers the OG's might as well fly SPA.
>Those
>maneuvers are harder than AMA maneuvers.
>
>Jim Ivey
>
>
>
>jivey61 at msn.com
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Henderson,Eric" <Eric.Henderson at gartner.com>
> >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
> >To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> >Subject: Schedules Old Geezer's proposal
> >Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:44:51 -0500
> >
> >A neat way to do this is have a class within a class, Still fly any
>class
> >just the way we always have, BUT modify the scoring program to ignore
>the
> >turnarounds for the OG's (Old Guys/Geezers)
> >
> >then they would compete with each other with center maneuvers - a.k.a.
> >maneuvers that they can see more clearly.
> >
> >You would have the normal 1,2 and 3rd stuff with another contest within
>the
> >class for 1,2 etc between the old ones....
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Almost old - Eric.
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
>[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
> >Behalf Of JOddino
> >Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 4:15 PM
> >To: discussion at nsrca.org
> >Subject: Re: Schedules Old Geezer's
> >
> >
> >I like Bob's idea but of course we need a higher multiplier for over 70
>and
> >I'd like another multiplier based on how many free throws the pilot can
>
> >make in a row.
> >My knees won't let me play basketball any more but I can shoot free
>throws
> >better now because that is all that I can do.
> >Jim
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Bob Pastorello <mailto:rcaerobob at cox.net>
> >To: discussion at nsrca.org
> >Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 7:30 AM
> >Subject: Re: Schedules Old Geezer's
> >
> >How about instead "weighting" scores based on an "age multiplier" ??
> >
> >For example, if entrant is UNDER 50, use judges' scores. Between 50 -
>60,
> >multiply scores by 1.025. 60 and over gets 1.05. And of course, those
>
> >UNDER 30, get multiplied by .75.....
> >
> >Would be interesting contest scoring....
> >
> >(Before anyone goes crazy - this is just "tongue in cheek", humor for
> >non-flyable Sunday morning)
> >
> >Bob Pastorello, Oklahoma
> >NSRCA 199, AMA 46373
> >rcaerobob at cox.net
> >www.rcaerobats.net
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: BUDDYonRC at aol.com
> >To: discussion at nsrca.org
> >Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 9:23 AM
> >Subject: Re: Schedules Old Geezer's
> >
> >Nat
> >You don't understand the OLD Geezers still fly in the same event and
> >compete against everyone the same as Juniors do now but there are
>awards
> >same as Juniors now to pick the best Old Geezer's
> >Buddy
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign
>in
>enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today!
>http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es
>
>=====================================
># To be removed from this list, send a message to
># discussion-request at nsrca.org
># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>#
>
>
>
>=====================================
># To be removed from this list, send a message to
># discussion-request at nsrca.org
># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
>#
>
_________________________________________________________________
Never get a busy signal because you are always connected with high-speed
Internet access. Click here to comparison-shop providers.
https://broadband.msn.com
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list