JR NES 4000 servo

davel322 at comcast.net davel322 at comcast.net
Sun Nov 16 17:55:47 AKST 2003


JR made several "super servos" - the ones suitable for pattern were the 4000, 7000, and 7100.

The 4000 is not a low profile servo - it is a "standard" case - same as 4031/4131 - slightly different from the 8101/8231/8417/8411 which have the wider spacing on bearings of the ouptut shaft.  The 4000 came with nylon gears.  Very good servo - in my opinion, performance is equal to an 8231 - but it is more power hungry than an 8231 as others have noted.

The 7000 "super servo" is low profile servo (with nylon gears, same case and gears as 7005).

The 7100 is another low profile "super servo" which is basically the same as the 7000 but with metal gears (7005 gears could also be retrofit).

Regards,

Dave Lockhart (Team JR)
DaveL322 at comcast.net
> I still use a few of them. If you fit 4005 nylon gears they are fast and tight. 
> They are low-profile and work well in the thin wing. Quique was using them last 
> year in pattern plane ailerons.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Eric.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Adam Glatt
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 8:23 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: JR NES 4000 servo
> 
> 
> JonLowe at aol.com wrote:
> 
> >I ended up with an airplane that has two JR NES 4000 servos in it.  The only 
> >info I can find on them on line calls them "Super Servos".  One site indicated 
> >they may be an early form of digital servos.  Anyone know more about these?
> >
> >Jon Lowe
> >NSRCA 3612
> >=====================================
> ># To be removed from this list, send a message to 
> ># discussion-request at nsrca.org
> ># and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> >#
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> I tried a few, and found them to be very very electricity hungry without 
> any advantage over digitals, so I gave them back and went with 
> digitals.  I think they were the intermediate between coreless and 
> digital for JR, and quickly shelved in place of the digitals which were 
> superior all around.
> 
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to 
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> 
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to 
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> 

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list