Judging Landing & take-offs. (was Re: Spoilers for Pattern Planes?????)

[Rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Indeed!!! 

BUT, here's the catch: Who are we going to get, that follow the book blindly 
and without argument, so that they will sit the chairs at the Nats?? That is 
the dilemma we face at the really large 
meets.

Matt K


> Subj:RE: Judging Landing & take-offs. (was Re: Spoilers for Pattern 
> Planes?????) 
> Date:11/12/2003 11:20:48 AM Eastern Standard Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:Eric.Henderson at gartner.com">Eric.Henderson at gartner.com</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:discussion at nsrca.org">discussion at nsrca.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
> 
> Ron,
>           Maybe we should select judges like we do jury selection. If they 
> insist on applying their own rules then they don't qualify to judge.
>  
> E.
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On 
> Behalf Of Ron Van Putte
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:10 AM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Judging Landing & takoffs. (was Re: Spoilers for Pattern 
> Planes?????)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 11, 2003, at 11:41 PM, Del Rykert wrote: 
> 
> >> I agree here and I was taught that takeoffs are centered but landings are 
>> to use the 30m zone. Is that not that the intended interpretation. 
>> 
>>      
>> 
>> 
> That's what the rule book says. BUT, some judges who are opinionated, 
> stupid, uninformed, you pick the reason, think the landing must be centered. 
> 
> Ron Van Putte 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20031112/48bcd31e/attachment.html