Mintor 1.7 - low cost engines
Wayne Galligan
wgalligan at goodsonacura.com
Thu Nov 6 05:45:52 AKST 2003
Mows the field quite nicely... thank you.
Wayne
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry Budd" <jbudd at QNET.COM>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: Mintor 1.7 - low cost engines
> Does it slice bread too? : )
>
> >Not to mention that it will idle at 1600 rpm and makes it great for
> >spin entry and landings.
> >
> >WG
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: <mailto:gfowler at raytheon.com>Gray E Fowler
> >To: <mailto:discussion at nsrca.org>discussion at nsrca.org
> >Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 8:29 AM
> >Subject: Re: Mintor 1.7 - low cost engines
> >
> >
> >Probably the biggest difference between the Mintor 1.7 and the other
> >two strokes is not the top end rpm, but the time it takes to go from
> >2000-8200 rpm on a big prop such as the APC 17X12 regular. The
> >acceleration and burst of power is phenomenal, and something the
> >flyer must get used to if you have been flying an OS or Webra.
> > While I have never owned a YS, I do believe this is what YS owners
> >swear by as "torque". With the Mintor 1.7, an 11lb pattern plane
> >can go from dead stop in the vertical to outta site, continuously
> >accelerating. I have actually been told that I fly too fast up and
> >too slow down....something I am trying to adjust. The cost of the
> >1.7 while not the lowest cost option but is much lower than the YS
> >DZ which it competes with.
> >
> >
> >
> >Gray Fowler
> >Principal Chemical Engineer
> >Composites Engineering
>
>
> --
> ___________
> Jerry Budd
> mailto:jbudd at qnet.com
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list