Speaking of power quietly
Ron Lockhart
ronlock at comcast.net
Fri May 30 06:54:15 AKDT 2003
Good stuff here.
The more clubs that get pro-active about noise, the
more incentive there is for manufacturers to provide
quiet equipment.
Ron Lockhart
----- Original Message -----
From: WHIP23 at aol.com
Date: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:05 am
Subject: Re: Speaking of power
> In a message dated 5/30/03 6:39:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> gfowler at raytheon.com writes:
> >
> > Good for FAI being 94 dB, but 96 is plenty low. While I was Pres
> of my club we passed a noise ordinance rule, measured the same way
pattern planes are.....limit is???? 103 dB!! And this was not
politically easy, but at least it now stops the monster screamers and
now when someone has a loud plane EVERYONE questions is it and we
measure. 94 dB is too low considering that an ARF trainer with a
bb .46 is 95-96 dB.
> > Getting a club noise rule in place is good, but for us a bit
> late. The gassers already pissed off two neighbors and now the 94-97
dB plane is a nusiance to them even though those planes had been flying
near their houses for 5 years without any complaints. I suggest that
all clubs get something in place BEFORE the problem starts. We were
proactive and had the rule voted on but not active when the first major
complaint happened. Now it is an on going battle. And like someone
else mentioned...the loud plane disappeared...not come back with
a "real muffler"....just gone and that is fine with the entire
Richardson club. By the way...we also banned props over 22" as they
were a huge noise culprit.
> >
> > Gray Fowler
> > Principal Chemical Engineer
> > Composites Engineering
>
> I'll "chime" in here. Everyone who thinks they don't have a noise
> issue should read this and pass it on the their club officers,
because the reality is that once you get noticed you can't be quiet
enough. This noise thing will be much easier if we are proactive. I
know this is not popular, but it is reality.
>
> Bob Whitacre
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list