New Mintors

[AcrophobicFlyer]

What about R/C Heli's?  They use up to and over 20% oil.  I have some that
has 24% oil.  Those engines are all covered up with a small fan for cooling.

Regards,
Adam Quennoz
AMA 383866
IMAC 2439
NSRCA 3546



----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Miller" <bd4 at inter-linc.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: New Mintors


> RC Car engines are in a very HOT environment.  Engine manufacturers
> recommend 12 -14% oil.  More oil causes them to run too hot
>
> Bob M
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <patterndude at attbi.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 7:56 AM
> Subject: RE: New Mintors
>
>
> > Tom,
> > How's that again?  Use less oil and the engine runs cooler with more
> power??
> > How can that be?
> > --Lance
> > > The Mintor factory says don't use MORE than 18% oil. I have talked
with
> > > them and they say running 16% oil will give you more power and the
> > > engine will run cooler. I think it is best to break in with 18% oil.
> > >
> > > Tom Collins
> > > BuyRC.com
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
> > > On Behalf Of patterndude at attbi.com
> > > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 1:34 PM
> > > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > > Subject: RE: New Mintors
> > >
> > > Eric,
> > > The manufacturer specs call for 18% oil in the fuel, as do most
> > > manufacturers.
> > > Going with 16% may not be necessary.  You already have the strongest
> > > engine
> > > around.
> > >   I haven't seen anyone post much more info than I posted originally.
> > > Jim W
> > > has a reliable setup, it sounds, and he's happy with the power, but my
> > > setup is
> > > getting a little more.  I have the Mintor carbon pipe and the Mintor
> > > header cut
> > > 1.5".  A 17x12N turned 8450 at 80 degrees on 10% Magnum fuel on Sunday
> > > this
> > > weekend.  Why run less oil with that kind of power?
> > >
> > > --Lance
> > > > Lance,
> > > >        I much prefer to have a tight engine. (Most engines that we
> > > receive are a
> > > > compromise so that the users don't break them). I would suggest that
> > > the
> > > > break-in instructions need to be a bit more comprehensive. The 170
may
> > > also be
> > > > different to the 1.40. (The Moki needed a similar break-in.) BTW it
> > > was not
> > > > cowled in very much. I had removed the top to accommodate the DZ
pump.
> > > I then
> > > > removed most of the front to accommodate the carb. (The Hydeout is
> > > quite narrow
> > > > at the spinner.)
> > > >
> > > > I tried using two different plugs on my modified OS 1.60 and one
> > > always died. I
> > > > will switch to the recommenced A5's when I get a cool run and see
how
> > > they do.
> > > >
> > > > The vertical was strong even though it was just a 16" prop. It was
> > > also nice and
> > > > quiet. Looking forward to trying some of my 3-blade props later on.
> > > >
> > > > Eric.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
> > > patterndude at attbi.com
> > > > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 1:11 AM
> > > > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > > > Subject: Re: New Mintors
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Eric,
> > > > I ran a gallon thru my two on the bench before putting them in the
> > > air.  There
> > > > have been several posts of people putting them up quickly and
they've
> > > reported
> > > > success.  More power to them.  I'm sure there are different break-in
> > > > procedures that work.
> > > >   In my case, similar to yours, the engines seemed tight at first.
I
> > > found
> > > > that they ran fine at mid throttle out of the box and the range
> > > extended with
> > > > a little running.  Your procedure sounds like it's working, but I
> > > agree it may
> > > > not be for everyone.
> > > >   The way I've always looked at it, break-in is a temporary
condition.
> > > No
> > > > need to rush it.  I have a friend with a Saito 180 which took a
while
> > > to break
> > > > in but then became a very reliable engine.  I'm not trying to
> > > associate one
> > > > engine with another, just pointing out that reliable engines result
> > > from a
> > > > variety of starting points.
> > > >   Thanks for sharing your experiences.
> > > > --Lance
> > >
> > > > > Partially broke-in my Mintor in today with help from Dave
Lockhart.
> > > Initially
> > > > > the engine was very tight and got hot very quickly.
> > > > >
> > > > > I switched to two F plugs and used sport 2-c 15% with 18% oil.
Still
> > > tight and
> > > > > hard to keep running without overheating. Finally I got a run with
a
> > > high idle
> > > > > that did not overheat. Then Dave persuaded me to go to full
throttle
> > > and set
> > > > it
> > > > > rich. It worked much better this time. A tank later we put it in
the
> > > air. It
> > > > ran
> > > > > very rich in the air. Several landings later ... with Dave turning
> > > in the
> > > > needle
> > > > > a click or two at a time.. we got a flight where we could lean it
by
> > > climbing
> > > > > and cool  down by diving. Round and square loops did the job.
> > > Another run on
> > > > the
> > > > > ground and a slightly leaner run in the air and it was almost
> > > running like a
> > > > > 2-c.
> > > > >
> > > > > The power on a 16 x 12 APC was encouraging and the idle began to
be
> > > more
> > > > > reliable.. I know the engine was tight before I began but was
> > > surprised that I
> > > > > had to be so diligent with the break-in. My question to you
> > > experienced
> > > > > Mintor-men is. "Is this usual?" Not complaining, but without my
own
> > > and
> > > > David's
> > > > > experience a "Rookie" could struggle...
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Eric.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > =====================================
> > > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > > #
> > > >
> > > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > > #
> > > >
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > #
> > >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> >
>
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#