YS DZ pipe

[Koenig, Tom]

Hi Adam,
 
I actually have one (698) sitting on my shelf at home. It is the same length
as the 693. The rear chambers appear to be the same as the 693. The
difference is the front portion. I think on the 693 they gained volume (
over the 692) by increasing the length of the front 15 mm pipe so that the
overall length went up to 530mm. On the 698 , its overall length is 530 as
well, rear chambers the same too, but as I mentioned it is the 35 mm section
that is now longer towards the front. The pipe has a lot more volume now. I
have always felt the 693 was 'choking'  the Dz a little, even though I have
tremendous power already.
 
I have not run it yet, but I am hoping it will make things a little quieter
and maybe gain some more power. It may even change that Dz note too.
 
Tom 

[Koenig, Tom] 
 
 
 
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: Adam Glatt [mailto:adam.g at sasktel.net]
Sent: Sunday, 23 March 2003 2:52 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: YS DZ pipe



Looking at a pipe for my YS DZ.  Does anyone know the differences and
pros/cons when comparing the Hatori 692 to the Hatori 698?  From the
pictures they look identical except that the 698 is much longer (530mm
compared to 380mm).  Both are 35mm in diameter.  Are there just more baffles
in the 698 to make it quieter?


************************************************************************
*PLEASE NOTE*  This email and any attachments may
be confidential. If received in error, please delete all 
copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or 
dissemination of this email or its attachments is 
prohibited without the consent of the sender.

WARNING RE VIRUSES:  Our computer systems sweep
outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty 
is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. 
Before opening or using attachments, please check for 
viruses.  Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any 
affected attachments.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the 
individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
and with authority, states them to be the views of the 
organisation.
************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030324/75527d07/attachment.html