MK elevator misalignment (part 2)

VicenteRC at aol.com VicenteRC at aol.com
Fri Mar 21 09:13:46 AKST 2003


I use the old "Y" push rod method as recomended in the Focus.  You will need to supports in the front and the back.  I use a real carbon rod (not the Dave Brown is not stiff enought).  In the front and the back I use 1/8" carbon rods to MK 2.5MM ball bearings.  The inrerface between the 1/4" carbon rod and the 1/8" carbon rod are attached with is small pieces of metal wire all glue with JB weld.

Not sure if clear enought.  Basically is the same system we use years ago but all is replaced with carbon rods and links are all ball bearing.

Vicente



In a message dated 3/21/2003 12:47:52 PM Eastern Standard Time, tkeithb at attbi.com writes:

> 
> 
> > putting servos in the stab halves
> 
> This is exactly what I had initially considered on my Aries so my removable
> stab would be easier to remove. Essentially they would be like small main
> wings.
> 
> However all the feedback that I received seemed to indicate that this was a
> bad idea due to extra weight, possible differences in throw over time, etc.
> 
> I'd like to hear pros and cons from others that use used this technique.
> 
> Thanks,
> Keith
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Stillman" <tony at radiosouthrc.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 8:31 AM
> Subject: Re: MK elevator misalignment (part 2)
> 
> 
> > I didn't like it on my Excellence either, and I went back to putting
> servos
> > in the stab halves per the instructions on the Smaragd on the PL website.
> >
> > Tony Stillman
> > Radio South, Inc.
> > 3702 N. Pace Blvd.
> > Pensacola, Fl 32505
> > www.radiosouthrc.com
> > 800-962-7802
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bill Carpenter" <bcarpenter at greenvilleisp.net>
> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 5:53 PM
> > Subject: Re: MK elevator misalignment (part 2)
> >
> >
> > > Wayne,
> > >
> > > I haven't been following this particular discussion very closely, but do
> I
> > > understand that you didn't like the MK bellcrank and went back to pull
> > pull
> > > on the Aries elevator???????
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > >From: wgalligan <wgalligan at cnbcom.net>
> > > >To: discussion at nsrca.org <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > > >Subject: Re: RE: MK elevator misalignment (part 2)
> > > >Date: Thu, Mar 20, 2003, 3:36 PM
> > > >
> > >
> > > > BACK to Kevlar pull/pull for me.  Much easier to adjustment in the
> > > > pull/pull also.
> > > >
> > > > Wayno
> > > >
> > > >> I think I may have the solution to this dilemma - Pull / Pull.
> > > >>
> > > >> Gene Maurice
> > > >> gene.maurice at attbi.com
> > > >> Plano, TX
> > > >> AMA 3408
> > > >> NSRCA 877
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > >> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Keith Black
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:21 PM
> > > >> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > > >> Subject: Re: MK elevator misalignment (part 2)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Just checked mine that I bought two or three months ago and found the
> > same
> > > >> thing. I also noticed that the holes where the arms are inserted are
> > not
> > > >> centered. This is probably what's causing the problem.
> > > >>
> > > >> Keith
> > > >>
> > > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> From: "wgalligan" <wgalligan at cnbcom.net>
> > > >> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 8:47 AM
> > > >> Subject: Re: MK elevator misalignment (part 2)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > I checked mine last night and I found the same thing.  Looseness
> and
> > the
> > > >> tabs where not aligned.  I was wondering why I was having a bit of a
> > problem
> > > >> with the differential when I was setting up.  I also noticed a slight
> > snap
> > > >> in the setup and thought it was in my connectors being loose but it
> was
> > the
> > > >> looseness of the assembled bellcrank. Know I know why.  When you
> > tighted the
> > > >> assembly the tabs can twist due to the slop. I too did the c/a trick
> > and it
> > > >> is tight and square now.
> > > >> > BTW this was the black MK Bellcrank and I purchased it last June
> '02
> > from
> > > >> Central Hobbies.  Definitely a Japanese product as you could barely
> > > >> understand the broken English.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Wayne
> > > >> >
> > > >> >    > I had the same problem with my MK belcrank that I had bought
> > last
> > > >> year. It also had a slop in the movement.The fix I applied is similar
> > just
> > > >> ca bonding a carbon strip on the flats and reshaping.
> > > >> > > BTW, I am expecting samples of a similar but different brand bb
> > elev
> > > >> belcrank (a local brand look-alike model). I will let you know about
> > their
> > > >> quality and possible availability of these ones when I receive the
> > samples.
> > > >> > > Nedim
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   ----- Original Message -----
> > > >> > >   From: NSRCA Canada-West
> > > >> > >   To: discussion at nsrca
> > > >> > >   Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:53 AM
> > > >> > >   Subject: MK elevator misalignment (part 2)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   Hi folk's
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   Further to my comments on the MK elevator alignment issue, I
> have
> > had
> > > >> a couple e-mails from other builder flyers that 1) have no alignment
> > problem
> > > >> and 2) do have an alignment problem. It appears as though it may be a
> > bad
> > > >> batch so heads up.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   I have posted a page showing the problem and a possible
> solution.
> > Hope
> > > >> this helps. http://members.shaw.ca/drev/mk.htm
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   Thanks to Iiro Nikkila for bring this to my (our) attention &
> > offering
> > > >> a solution.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >   Dave
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > =====================================
> > > >> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > >> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > >> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > >> > #
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> =====================================
> > > >> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > >> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > >> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > >> #
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> =====================================
> > > >> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > >> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > >> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > >> #
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > =====================================
> > > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > > #
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus ]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---
> > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus ]
> > >
> > > =====================================
> > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the 
> body.
> > > #
> > >
> > >
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> 
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to 
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list