Swallow & Also Servos
Ihncheol Park
PatternFlyer at msn.com
Fri Jun 27 19:57:03 AKDT 2003
Wade,
APC 15x8? @ 10K? or 15% nitro 18% oil fuel?
91FX/SX-H with muffler turns APC 13x8 @11100, 15x8 @8400, 16x8 @7500 rpm,
20% coolpower.
Your Tower 75 sounds to be a great engine at a very low cost!
Any midrange richness?
My 91SX-H is very rich in the middle and only 1/2 turn out for highspeed
needle.
I have a Perry pump ready to fine tune the mid-range. Then, there will be a
tuned pipe (tried with 15x8 @ 9400 rpm and still more header to cut).
I just hope this combination can run close to YS 91.
I just wish I had my fuel delivered today. Not enough fuel left to fly any.
Ihncheol
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Wade Akle
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:20 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Swallow & Also Servos
Tower 75 with 12x6 (planning on 13x6 when fully broken-in), APC 15x18 fuel,
10,000 rpm (slightly rich). It does very large Advanced maneuvers.
I'm puzzled, an OS 91FX should rocket it into space!!
Before I got the 75 I used the Tower 61 for a few flights. It worked, but
the maneuvers were labored.
Wade
----- Original Message -----
From: "glenn hatfield" <randy10926 at comcast.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: Swallow & Also Servos
> I am surprised that the Tower 75 is enough power for advanced. I have
> a OS 91FX in mine and do not seem to have enough power for
> intermediate. What prop are you running and what RPM to you get?
>
> Randy
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Wade Akle <wbakle at charter.net>
> Date: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:02 am
> Subject: Swallow & Also Servos
>
> > Paul,
> > I built the Swallow as a bare-bones demo for my flying buddies to
> > show them
> > that you could fly pattern as sport. Therefore, stock Tower 75
> > muffler, no
> > pipes or any pattern goodies. To my surprise, I am enjoying flying
> > Advancedwith it and using it a lot more than my full size
> > patterns. I guess its the
> > freedom of knowing that the investment is low, the size
> > convenient, and the
> > setup easy.
> >
> > By the way, I also used standard servos after reading on this site the
> > results of the Australian UAV research on servo selections. I was
> > amazedthat so few responses were made about the Aussie results.
> > It's one thing to
> > have the money to buy the 'most expensive' it's another to ignore
> > data. We
> > are talking about standard resin gear servos centering and slop
> > compared to
> > servos 10x the cost.
> >
> > Wade
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul Horan" <phoran at vvm.com>
> > To: "Wade Akle" <wbakle at charter.net>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: Swallow
> >
> >
> > > Wade,
> > > It appears that the Swallow has a single piece mid-wing. The
> > pipe/silencer tunnel is on the bottom side of the wing; therefore,
> > > the pipe must be removed when ever the wing is removed. Is this
> > correct?
> > > Thanks,
> > > Paul
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Wade Akle" <wbakle at charter.net>
> > > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:36 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Swallow
> > >
> > >
> > > > Eric,
> > > > I have a Swallow with Tower's .75 engine. Talk about
> > inexpensive, $330
> > for
> > > > them, but it proved to be a great choice and does Advanced
> > well, for me.
> > The
> > > > engine purrs below 1700 and roars up to 10000 rpm, never
> > missed. A
> > relief
> > > > from the YS and Webra's. Expensive pattern is by choice not
> > requirement,> > unless you compete at the national level. I have
> > built and flown many
> > full
> > > > pattern ships, that I enjoyed, but now I mix in easy,
> > inexpensive Fun.
> > > > I am very interested in a comparison of the Swallow with the
> > Quest.> > Wade
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Henderson,Eric" <Eric.Henderson at gartner.com>
> > > > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:19 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: Swallow
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Good luck tomorrow Bill.
> > > >
> > > > I think the Swallow will like the power of the 1.30.
> > > >
> > > > I did my QUEST test flights today that I will post in a
> > separate note.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Eric.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > > [discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Bill Glaze
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:50 PM
> > > > To: NSRCA discussion
> > > > Subject: Swallow
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Just got a look at Eric's review of the Swallow. Could hardly
> > have come
> > > > at a better time. I'm testing mine tomorrow, weather permitting.
> > > > Powered by a Y.S. 1.20, (the old one) it weighs just under 8-
> > 1/4 lbs.
> > > > After reading what he says, I believe I'll reduce my control
> > throw on
> > > > the elevators, at least, and maybe ailerons also.
> > > > I'll post to the list--boy, do I absolutely hate first flights!
> > > >
> > > > Bill Glaze
> > > >
> > > > =====================================
> > > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > > #
> > > >
> > > > ============# To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > > #
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > =====================================
> > > > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > > > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > > > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > > > #
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> >
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list