Swallow

[Wade Akle]

The Swallow flew so well that the next one will have an OS91 Surpass in it.
I already had the engine. The cost doubles.
What is the URL source for the Irvines?
Wade
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Mueller" <mmueller at triangleprinters.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:15 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Swallow


> I have alot of experience with Tower engines aka GMS and have found that a
> perry pump on them makes them run alot better. They are monsters but now
I'm
> in love with Irvines.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Uhler [mailto:juhler at bellsouth.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:01 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Re: Swallow
>
>
> Wade,
>
> I have a few friends that use the Tower .75.  It is wild how well they
run,
> strong and cheap....
>
> Take care,
>
> Jon
>
> >
> > From: "Wade Akle" <wbakle at charter.net>
> > Date: 2003/06/25 Wed PM 08:36:47 EDT
> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > Subject: Re: Swallow
> >
> > Eric,
> > I have a Swallow with Tower's .75 engine. Talk about inexpensive, $330
for
> > them, but it proved to be a great choice and does Advanced well, for me.
> The
> > engine purrs below 1700 and roars up to 10000 rpm, never missed. A
relief
> > from the YS and Webra's. Expensive pattern is by choice not requirement,
> > unless you compete at the national level. I have built and flown many
full
> > pattern ships, that I enjoyed, but now I mix in easy, inexpensive Fun.
> > I am very interested in a comparison of the Swallow with the Quest.
> > Wade
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Henderson,Eric" <Eric.Henderson at gartner.com>
> > To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:19 PM
> > Subject: RE: Swallow
> >
> >
> > Good luck tomorrow Bill.
> >
> > I think the Swallow will like the power of the 1.30.
> >
> > I did my QUEST test flights today that I will post in a separate note.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Eric.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Bill Glaze
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:50 PM
> > To: NSRCA discussion
> > Subject: Swallow
> >
> >
> > Just got a look at Eric's review of the Swallow.  Could hardly have come
> > at a better time.  I'm testing mine tomorrow, weather permitting.
> > Powered by a Y.S. 1.20, (the old one) it weighs just under 8-1/4 lbs.
> > After reading what he says, I believe I'll reduce my control throw on
> > the elevators, at least, and maybe ailerons also.
> > I'll post to the list--boy, do I absolutely hate first flights!
> >
> > Bill Glaze
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> > ============# To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> >
> >
> > =====================================
> > # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> > # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> > # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> > #
> >
> >
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>


=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#