Swallow

[Nik Middleton]

I agree, the Irvine 2 strokes are ultra reliable, with not a lot of cost

rgds


-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Mike Mueller
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:15 PM
To: 'discussion at nsrca.org'
Subject: RE: Re: Swallow


 I have alot of experience with Tower engines aka GMS and have found that a
perry pump on them makes them run alot better. They are monsters but now I'm
in love with Irvines.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Uhler [mailto:juhler at bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:01 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Re: Swallow


Wade,

I have a few friends that use the Tower .75.  It is wild how well they run,
strong and cheap....

Take care,

Jon

>
> From: "Wade Akle" <wbakle at charter.net>
> Date: 2003/06/25 Wed PM 08:36:47 EDT
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: Swallow
>
> Eric,
> I have a Swallow with Tower's .75 engine. Talk about inexpensive, $330 for
> them, but it proved to be a great choice and does Advanced well, for me.
The
> engine purrs below 1700 and roars up to 10000 rpm, never missed. A relief
> from the YS and Webra's. Expensive pattern is by choice not requirement,
> unless you compete at the national level. I have built and flown many full
> pattern ships, that I enjoyed, but now I mix in easy, inexpensive Fun.
> I am very interested in a comparison of the Swallow with the Quest.
> Wade
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henderson,Eric" <Eric.Henderson at gartner.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:19 PM
> Subject: RE: Swallow
>
>
> Good luck tomorrow Bill.
>
> I think the Swallow will like the power of the 1.30.
>
> I did my QUEST test flights today that I will post in a separate note.
>
> Regards,
>
> Eric.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Bill Glaze
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:50 PM
> To: NSRCA discussion
> Subject: Swallow
>
>
> Just got a look at Eric's review of the Swallow.  Could hardly have come
> at a better time.  I'm testing mine tomorrow, weather permitting.
> Powered by a Y.S. 1.20, (the old one) it weighs just under 8-1/4 lbs.
> After reading what he says, I believe I'll reduce my control throw on
> the elevators, at least, and maybe ailerons also.
> I'll post to the list--boy, do I absolutely hate first flights!
>
> Bill Glaze
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
> ============# To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#