Calling Maneuvers for Judges

[adriancwong at earthlink.net]

Keith,

The pilot should finish the whole sequence without responding to the judges.

After completing the flight, he or she can discuss it with the CD.

Adrian


-------Original Message-------
From: Keith Black <tkeithb at attbi.com>
Sent: 06/11/03 11:01 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Calling Maneuvers for Judges

> 
> How about when you hear the judge say something like "isn't he supposed to
be inverted", and you're not. This happen to one of the pilots two or
three
times in the *same* flight at one contest I attended. Obviously that's
very
distracting to the pilot and caller.

Question, if you hear this from the judges should you respond verbally?
Seems like this level of confusion would totally blow the whole flight.
What
would be the proper protocol for the pilot during and after the flight if
something like this occurs?

Keith Black


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Lockhart" <ronlock at comcast.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: Calling Maneuvers for Judges


> Adding the function of calling in a manner suitable
> for judging can be a distraction from 'Caller for Pilot'
> duties.  It's not desirable, but the realities of
> contest manpower sometimes require it.
>
> Even more distracting is (have you been there as a
> pilot or caller?) hearing a scribe call maneuvers
> late or early...and ya hope the judge isn't
> listening. <VBG>
>
> Ron Lockhart
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: WHIP23 at aol.com
> Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:29 am
> Subject: Re: Wrong Maneuver issues
>
> > In a message dated 6/11/03 8:12:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > Patternrules at aol.com writes:
> >
> > >
> > > Personally I like it when the caller calls the maneuvers loud
> > enough for the
> > > judges to hear, then I don't need a scribe just a blank paper,
> > then
> > > transcribe the # after the flight.
> > >
> > > Steve Maxwell
> >
> > I agree, with the caller calling the maneuvers loud enough for the
> > judges to
> > hear, but I have found that there is a lot of resistance to this
> > proceedure.
> > I've always viewed presenting the sequence such that the judges
> > could judge
> > it, easily and correctly as part of the "job" and the caller can
> > contribute to
> > that to a large degree, by calling the maneuvers such that there
> > is no
> > confusion.  I will also point out that I have nearly been lynched
> > for this position,
> > on occasion :-)
> >
> > This otta' get some action going on the list (flame suit on, bring it)
> >
> > Bob
> >
>
> =====================================
> # To be removed from this list, send a message to
> # discussion-request at nsrca.org
> # and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
> #
>

=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#

> 
=====================================
# To be removed from this list, send a message to 
# discussion-request at nsrca.org
# and put leave discussion on the first line of the body.
#