Wrong Maneuver issues

[Bill Glaze]

I read about a guy on another list who said he refused when the judges
asked him to have his caller call loudly enough for them to hear.  He
said he told them it was up to them to know the sequence.
Strangely enough, he never said how highly he scored.<G>
Nothing helps you score quite as highly as starting out with a tense
judge/contestant relationship!
Bill Glaze

Tony Stillman wrote:

> Bob:
>
> I agree totally!
>
> Guess I better put my suit on as well......  Tony Stillman
> Radio South
> 3702 N. Pace Blvd.
> Pensacola, FL 32505
> 1-800-962-7802
> www.radiosouthrc.com
>
>      ----- Original Message -----
>      From: WHIP23 at aol.com
>      To: discussion at nsrca.org
>      Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:29 AM
>      Subject: Re: Wrong Maneuver issues
>       In a message dated 6/11/03 8:12:14 AM Pacific Daylight
>      Time, Patternrules at aol.com writes:
>
>
>     >
>     > Personally I like it when the caller calls the maneuvers
>     > loud enough for the judges to hear, then I don't need a
>     > scribe just a blank paper, then transcribe the # after the
>     > flight.
>     >
>     > Steve Maxwell
>
>      I agree, with the caller calling the maneuvers loud enough
>      for the judges to hear, but I have found that there is a lot
>      of resistance to this proceedure.  I've always viewed
>      presenting the sequence such that the judges could judge it,
>      easily and correctly as part of the "job" and the caller can
>      contribute to that to a large degree, by calling the
>      maneuvers such that there is no confusion.  I will also
>      point out that I have nearly been lynched for this position,
>      on occasion :-)
>
>      This otta' get some action going on the list (flame suit on,
>      bring it)
>
>      Bob
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030611/8d9c157a/attachment.html