Wrong Maneuver issues
Paul Reed
paul at judco.net
Wed Jun 11 12:06:16 AKDT 2003
I agree 100%
Paul Reed
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
Behalf Of Henderson,Eric
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:59 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: RE: Wrong Maneuver issues
The idea of callers "helping" judges sounds good but is not at all good in
practice.
First of all, you have to be close enough to hear. Pilots do not want or
need maneuvers shouted at them or even given in full text descriptions.
Secondly, some pilots do not actually have them called.
Thirdly, many pilots get the maneuvers verbalized in pairs so that they
can set up for the next center maneuver.
Last on this list, but not least, almost all pilots have the maneuver
called before the current one is finished.
I am a big advocate of keeping the judges and the pilots apart in all ways
during the flight.
Regards,
Eric.
-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
Behalf Of WHIP23 at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:29 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Wrong Maneuver issues
In a message dated 6/11/03 8:12:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
Patternrules at aol.com writes:
Personally I like it when the caller calls the maneuvers loud enough for
the judges to hear, then I don't need a scribe just a blank paper, then
transcribe the # after the flight.
Steve Maxwell
I agree, with the caller calling the maneuvers loud enough for the judges
to hear, but I have found that there is a lot of resistance to this
proceedure. I've always viewed presenting the sequence such that the judges
could judge it, easily and correctly as part of the "job" and the caller can
contribute to that to a large degree, by calling the maneuvers such that
there is no confusion. I will also point out that I have nearly been
lynched for this position, on occasion :-)
This otta' get some action going on the list (flame suit on, bring it)
Bob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030611/d28cf3e0/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list