Wrong Maneuver issues

[wgalligan]

I agree Bob,  When I have had to do some judging it was always nice to hear that next manuver being called after intensley observing the previous double flip side slippin immilized fling over. <VBG>

Didnt the pilot have to call all his manuvers to the judge with out a caller way back when?.  The helper was there to assist getting the plane started in less then 3 minutes and making sure the gear where locked down, then you taxied out to the line called take off and rolled out.  If I remember correctly?
 
WG
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: WHIP23 at aol.com 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:29 AM
  Subject: Re: Wrong Maneuver issues


  In a message dated 6/11/03 8:12:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Patternrules at aol.com writes:



    Personally I like it when the caller calls the maneuvers loud enough for the judges to hear, then I don't need a scribe just a blank paper, then transcribe the # after the flight.

    Steve Maxwell 


  I agree, with the caller calling the maneuvers loud enough for the judges to hear, but I have found that there is a lot of resistance to this proceedure.  I've always viewed presenting the sequence such that the judges could judge it, easily and correctly as part of the "job" and the caller can contribute to that to a large degree, by calling the maneuvers such that there is no confusion.  I will also point out that I have nearly been lynched for this position, on occasion :-)

  This otta' get some action going on the list (flame suit on, bring it)

  Bob 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030611/3be418b5/attachment.html