Wrong Maneuver issues

[Zapata, Lisandro]

I desagree, I like to use my helper (caller) to let me know my position in
the box (left, center, right, low, high, symetrical, round, square, etc),
basically is the one that from outside tells me how consistent is my flight
during a round, so I can concentrate in my timing and my fingers.
I thing the judges should know the sequence without the need to ask for wich
maneuver is next. But may be many don't like this idea.
 
Arturo

 
 -----Original Message-----
From: WHIP23 at aol.com [mailto:WHIP23 at aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:29 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Wrong Maneuver issues



In a message dated 6/11/03 8:12:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
Patternrules at aol.com writes:




Personally I like it when the caller calls the maneuvers loud enough for the
judges to hear, then I don't need a scribe just a blank paper, then
transcribe the # after the flight.

Steve Maxwell 



I agree, with the caller calling the maneuvers loud enough for the judges to
hear, but I have found that there is a lot of resistance to this proceedure.
I've always viewed presenting the sequence such that the judges could judge
it, easily and correctly as part of the "job" and the caller can contribute
to that to a large degree, by calling the maneuvers such that there is no
confusion.  I will also point out that I have nearly been lynched for this
position, on occasion :-)

This otta' get some action going on the list (flame suit on, bring it)

Bob 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030611/47988cd8/attachment.html