Wrong Maneuver issues

[WHIP23 at aol.com]

In a message dated 6/11/03 8:12:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
Patternrules at aol.com writes:

> 
> Personally I like it when the caller calls the maneuvers loud enough for the 
> judges to hear, then I don't need a scribe just a blank paper, then 
> transcribe the # after the flight.
> 
> Steve Maxwell 

I agree, with the caller calling the maneuvers loud enough for the judges to 
hear, but I have found that there is a lot of resistance to this proceedure.  
I've always viewed presenting the sequence such that the judges could judge 
it, easily and correctly as part of the "job" and the caller can contribute to 
that to a large degree, by calling the maneuvers such that there is no 
confusion.  I will also point out that I have nearly been lynched for this position, 
on occasion :-)

This otta' get some action going on the list (flame suit on, bring it)

Bob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20030611/ae1c575e/attachment.html